I feel improvements on the SF SVN. Now it takes only 1 checkout and 1 update
now!
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Tuna Toksöz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to update at least 5 times to get the sourcecode.
> Does it happening to anybody else?
>
> --
> Tuna Toksöz
>
> Typos included to enha
A patch would be welcome! Just kidding ;)
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 16, 10:48 am, "c.sokun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > please move to code.google.com or codeplex
> >
>
> *Please* _never_ move to codeplex! I'll do anything!!
>
>
> --Stuar
On Oct 16, 10:48 am, "c.sokun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> please move to code.google.com or codeplex
>
*Please* _never_ move to codeplex! I'll do anything!!
--Stuart
p.s. That's the first time I've been tempted to write a message in all
caps in a very long time.
--~--~-~--~~--
Just a a thought. It might sound radical but I think it'll ultimately be for
the better for everybody.
A high level 3 step process of what I'm thinking would go something like
this:
1. Identify and employ a suitable tool(s) to migrate existing codebase to
most reliable and flexible platform
(Does this mean that i am complaining about it too much? :) just kidding)
Going back to topic lets wait for some time more to see if SF could become
better than ever, if it keeps us suffering, than we can consider again.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
2008/10/16 Tuna Toksöz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You're reading my mind.
>
jajajaja no I don't have that power... It is only because I chat with
you every day.
--
Fabio Maulo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
You're reading my mind.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/16 Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Sincerely, change the repository is the last in the list of my work in NH.
>>
>>
> And without mentions about NHV, ApplicationBlocks and so on...
> Per
2008/10/16 Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sincerely, change the repository is the last in the list of my work in NH.
>
>
And without mentions about NHV, ApplicationBlocks and so on...
Perhaps, in some moment, Tuna will need an help with LINQ2NH because he
can't continue that work alone (alone=
Right, many works less time. What Fabio list is the most wanted features so
far.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/16 David Mukaiwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Just a a thought. It might sound radical but I think it'll ultimately be
>> for the better f
LOL. OK - maybe not right away. Perhaps post 2.1. We're drooling here.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/16 David Mukaiwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Just a a thought. It might sound radical but I think it'll ultimately be
>> for the better for everybo
2008/10/16 David Mukaiwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Just a a thought. It might sound radical but I think it'll ultimately be
> for the better for everybody.
> A high level 3 step process of what I'm thinking would go something like
> this:
>
>
>1. Identify and employ a suitable tool(s) to migrate e
Yes, definitely. Sourceforge is the step to OSS for me. Like it a lot.
I wish they fix the problems soon.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/16 Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> history can be exported from SF and imported to GC. this is not a val
2008/10/16 Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> history can be exported from SF and imported to GC. this is not a valid
> point.
>
jajajajaja ;) I'm not talking about the SVN dump...
Jen... SourceForge IS a BIG part of the history of OSS.
I love Google services... I'm using a lot: mail, mailing-lis
history can be exported from SF and imported to GC. this is not a valid
point.
what I liked a lot about g-code is the apparent great support.
example:
initially a user can only create up to 10 projects, and have 100MB storage
on each.
they do that to fight bots etc exploiting it to mass distribu
Let's wait and watch SF fix the things.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:52 PM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have no plan to move NH repository in some other server.SourceForge are
> working to give us a better service and we can be patient.
> The history of the OSS can't be thrown so eas
We have no plan to move NH repository in some other server.SourceForge are
working to give us a better service and we can be patient.
The history of the OSS can't be thrown so easy... please be patient and use
the SF forum for SF issues... they must have the opportunity to fix the
problem.
2008/10
Hmm, don't know.
Its really cool that google doesn't allow to create a project space with
name nhibernate because it is already registered at sourceforge!
I just tried it to prevent anybody from grabbing the name!
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried e
I tried every possible mix of foward and back slashes, and more stuff. spend
WAAYYY too much time on that crap.
and that's especially when I can use a different tool, which has zero
friction, like g-code
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Tuna Toksöz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah 403 error, C
Ah 403 error, Codeplex seems to be very stable for me, i think you are
having authentication problems. Be cautious that your username is not your
TFS name. Basically
*Project Name:* OpenReflect
*Username:* snd\tehlike_cp
*Password:*
*Server Name:* tfs08.codeplex.com
*Port number:* 443
*Protocol:*
I'\d love to havr it on git ...
seriously.
I've opened a new OSS project last week.
thought to try out Codeplex.
The signup process was way too long, with busy screens etc.
and at the end I couldn't even checkout my created repository (using the cmd
tool, using the Team Explorer thingie, using
lol :) let's move to GIT :)
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how can you spell these two in the same sentence?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:48 PM, c.sokun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> please move to code.google.com or codeplex
>>
>> On Oct 15, 10:
how can you spell these two in the same sentence?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:48 PM, c.sokun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> please move to code.google.com or codeplex
>
> On Oct 15, 10:35 pm, "Sidar Ok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think moving to google code should be something to consider se
please move to code.google.com or codeplex
On Oct 15, 10:35 pm, "Sidar Ok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think moving to google code should be something to consider seriously.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any ideas about that?
>
> > well I gue
I think moving to google code should be something to consider seriously.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any ideas about that?
>>
>
> well I guess Sourceforge is killing you
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Ayende Rahien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>
> Any ideas about that?
>
well I guess Sourceforge is killing you
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Ayende Rahien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They say that they fixed that:
> http://sourceforge.net/community/forum/topic.php?id=3763&page
>
> However, I am getting 403 forbidden when trying to co
They say that they fixed that:
http://sourceforge.net/community/forum/topic.php?id=3763&page
However, I am getting 403 forbidden when trying to commit. Any ideas about
that?
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been disappointed with them for quite some ti
The problem is that the connection is lost. Aparently SF is too slow
to respond. Just keep updating and itll be all there.
Hielke
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this grou
More than 10 updates, still waiting.
I have to admit that in school library the connection is not that stable.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 7:35 PM, c.sokun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yeah, I did experience the same problem where I have to run update 4-5
> times to get the code.
> I thought that w
yeah, I did experience the same problem where I have to run update 4-5
times to get the code.
I thought that was my connection speed problem however svn up on other
project seem to work out just fine.
On Oct 12, 9:13 pm, "Fabio Maulo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The site status
> infohttps://so
The site status info
https://sourceforge.net/community/forum/forum.php?id=11&page
Forums
https://sourceforge.net/community/forum/
--
Fabio Maulo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To p
As you can imagine here is no problems (here = this side of the world)
2008/10/12 Tuna Toksöz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yes, it does but there are times that I need to check out at least trunk,
> in order to create a patch when i am also working on something else.
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 4:59 PM,
Yes, it does but there are times that I need to check out at least trunk, in
order to create a patch when i am also working on something else.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably you are using the entirely repository.When a big branch or a big
> tag
trunk only here.
still lots and lots of problems with the svn
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably you are using the entirely repository.When a big branch or a big
> tag is added to the repository and you try the update you may need more than
> one up
Probably you are using the entirely repository.When a big branch or a big
tag is added to the repository and you try the update you may need more than
one update to have entirely repository back to your working-copy.
In NH I'm using specific working-copy: one for trunk and the other for
NH2.0.x bra
I didn't know about transferring history, it would be cool then.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it's still crap
>
> and it's not so radical.
> google code supports uploading a project with it's history
> and NH is not using the wiki, site hosting and issue
it's still crap
and it's not so radical.
google code supports uploading a project with it's history
and NH is not using the wiki, site hosting and issue tracker, so nothing
will be changed, except for users updating their svn checkout url
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Ayende Rahien <[EMAIL PR
I had some issues, but not nearly as bad.I think that they did some upgrade
to SVN some time ago
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been disappointed with them for quite some time now.
>
> I wasn't even able to update at all for a few weeks. now updating
It would be a radical movement, not sure if it is applicable though.
I have to admit that SF became too slow, even their website is so slow.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been disappointed with them for quite some time now.
>
> I wasn't even able to
I've been disappointed with them for quite some time now.
I wasn't even able to update at all for a few weeks. now updating NH takes
about 5-6 updates every time.
crazy idea. as NH is not using any of the fancy sourceforge stuff, why not
move it to somewhere more stable? (say - google code)
On
39 matches
Mail list logo
