[Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Differences in valve covers?

2018-04-01 Thread pdxkevy
> > Thanks for the info everyone. I kinda thought that might be the case but, > figured I'd consult experts :) > thanks again -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving em

Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Differences in valve covers?

2018-04-01 Thread Dave duChêne
I'm told the extra flange has something to do with the California model. I have one on mine and it works fine. Dave On 31 March 2018 at 20:54, wrote: > I found what i believe to be the perfect match engine for my 1984 Honda > CA659sc. Strangely the valve cover on the new engine has a additional

Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Differences in valve covers?

2018-04-01 Thread Graham Rogers
Rubber hose elongated ‘S’ looking, runs from that valve cover flange to the bottom of the air box. I remove it when i remove the cabs, just pulls off, inserts into the air box at the other end. My 700Shas it also. Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 9:10 PM ddt wrote: > Looks like there are two different types

[Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Differences in valve covers?

2018-04-01 Thread ddt
Looks like there are two different types of valve covers, depending on the engine number. There's a "breather" in the parts list, only for one version. I guess, it's a breathing flange, according to stricter emission laws. So it should be working fine if you use your " old" cover. But that's onl