I haven't piped up because my NHs are 80s bikes, but the front ones that are
running lights are 3 wire and the rear ones that are blinker only are 2wire.
If you've got one that's on all the time I'd suspect it's grounding out
somewhere it shouldn't, or possibly a previous owner committed some
shena
What a memory you have Javier! Graham
On Mar 31, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Javier Garcia wrote:
My 96 doesn't have running lights on the back. Additional to engine
color and forks drain plugs, I noticed that the exahusts in
Graham's 2002 are just a bit shorther than in mine. I can't
remember any
Ok, so basically nobody has rear running lights on their bikes. I
guess I am back to square one and figuring out why the left side is
acting like a running light and a turn signal and the right is only
acting like a turn signal. Thanks for the help.
On Mar 31, 10:18 am, Javier Garcia wrote:
> My
My 96 doesn't have running lights on the back. Additional to engine color
and forks drain plugs, I noticed that the exahusts in Graham's 2002 are just
a bit shorther than in mine. I can't remember any other difference.
Javier.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Joey Kelley wrote:
> I agree - up
I agree - up here in Maine it is illegal to display any color other
than Red for rear tail lights.
My suspicious is that there is something wrong in the
wiring harness and that particular light is being cross fed
electricity from the tail lamp circuit. Perhaps the issue isn't the
lack of
A few thoughts. I agree with Allen, there should not be much if any
differences between all 91-03 hawks. But I think the most obvious
answer is that in a lot of states it is illegal to have rear yellow
running lights, so I doubt that Honda would ever produce a bike that
way if it was destined for s
