nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

Thank you all for your posts on this topic! I‘m pretty sure too that there isn‘t a thing to worry about.

Finally ported the rubberband router from Ruby to Nim

That router project was the most important reason in 2014 for leaving Ruby and searching for another compiled and statically typed language. The router itself needs at least a delaunay triangulation and a reliable convexHullOfDisk implementation, and used

Installation and configuration of the Nim language

There is no consensus but IMHO "download 64bit (finish.exe) installer" is what you should do. And once you're more familiar with the setup, bootstrap from Nim's github repo -- this way you'll have a very good understanding how it all _really_ works. Understanding is priceless.

Installation and configuration of the Nim language

I am about to start on Nim. Is there any preferred way to install it on Win 10? I can: * recompile * download 64bit (finish.exe) installer * use chosenim * use chocolatey

Concatenation of seq and array?

Again, this is an issue of sticking to the concept* of concatenation while the types you have at hand aren't a good fit for it due to ambiguity (contrary to a linked list, for example). Either you have a growable sequence or an immutable one, you need to iterate the items you want to grow it wi

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

They are certainly false positives. I use Windows 10 64 bits and disable Windows Defender and I also don't use any anti-virus, because even unfortunate source code sometimes accuses them as viruses. I sent all my .exe (64 bits), devel version 1.5.1, compiled on my own machine with gcc 10.3.0 t

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

Hello, I've analized the execution in a sandbox and they don't modify any file or the registry at all, it's only false positives. In this case, one or more binary sequences in the symbols table of the executables are triggering these false alarms. Strip the symbol table of the executables and

streamlining nim and showing off quick apps

Theres a "This month with Nim" to showcase similar stuff thats very active.

Concatenation of seq and array?

> I would say that this is a serious performance trap not only for beginners. The following programming languages have "performance traps" where you can't just ignore basic algorithmetic complexity analysis results from computer science: * Rust * C# * Ruby * Delphi * Lua * Java *

Need help implementing bind for C for webview.h

Hey, About the version, I wrote that based on the information I have on the webview main git repo. If you look at all the functions they deprecated from 0.1.1 to 0.10.0, you still use the header with those. eg. `inject_css` not in the new version

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

I have downloaded the nim-1.4.6 source tarball, mingw and recompiled nim.exe x64 on a windows 10 machine. Here is the virustotal report : zero detection. Could we know a bit more abo

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

> Could we know a bit more about the build environment releasing the official > nim-1.4.6 x64 prebuilt binaries for windows ? It's simply a nightly build that moved over to our server. See

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

virustotal doesn't report a bitdefender detection either, it's more a matter of a few alternative antivirus reports plus well knowns avast, avg, mcafee

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

That’s nothing new. Antivirus designers prefer false positives to false negatives. It’s understandable: missing a virus may have terrible consequences while false alerts are only an annoyance. Now, what can be done when there is so much false positives? For sure, there is some pattern which has

Concatenation of seq and array?

It might be easy to dismiss this as a straw man, with the spurious creation of `@[i]` every loop but there's a more realistic gotcha here. between for i in 1..1e5: result &= i Run and for i in 1e5: result = result & i Run The

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

I checked that "nim-1.4.6_x64.zip" on my windows box. Defender didn't reported anything...

Concatenation of seq and array?

In some code ported from Ruby I have grep "& @" ~/Router/router.nim lcuts = v.vertex.neighbors - (lcuts & @[u.vertex, w.vertex]) Run First I wrote lcuts & [u.vertex, w.vertex] but without the to seq operator it does not compile. I wondered why concatenat

streamlining nim and showing off quick apps

Hi all I had a rough idea, and wanted to share. Do you know those ludum dare games, where people write a simple game in 1-2 days? Nim is pretty productive, why not do something similar, let's say every two weeks? This can both "showoff" Nim, help new users learn from experienced ones, and sh

Need help implementing bind for C for webview.h

You can `const_cast` arguments when interfacing with C++ to solve this issue . Here is an example : func data*(self: CppString): ptr cchar {.importcpp: "const_cast(#.data())".} Run

Need help implementing bind for C for webview.h

hello, no I do not use the old version, I said that on my system there is only gtk3, gtk4 is not ported to XFCE4 Manjaro, but it is the same for the use of webview.h

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

ETH you mean? :)

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

I have tested nim.exe and nimble.exe x64 for versions 1.4.0 up to 1.4.6, it seems it's only the 1.4.6 build that raises this issue (v1.4.5 is missing from downloads btw)

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

nim.exe too: 5 security vendors flagged this file as malicious

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

7 security vendors flagged this file as malicious > Avast FileRepMalware AVG FileRepMalware Avira (no cloud) TR/AD.Bazar.urvmh Ikarus Trojan.Bazar McAfee Artemis!AF5F08E7F836

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

nimsuggest does tend to run my cpu at 100% for no reason, maybe it's mining bitcoin

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

I don't know how to handle it. I downloaded the zip now on a linux mint computer, it on VirusTotal. It reports several Trojaner, found with the following av engines: Alibaba, AVG, Ikarus, McAffee-GW-Edition, Qihoo-360, Avast, Avira (no cloud), McAfee and Microsoft. But anyway, nearly every eng

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

Use a better virus scanner?

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

Sorry for the spam. I compared the sha256 hashes, they fit. So it seems that my computer does not change the downloaded zip. If I check the url: in / It reports no infection. If I upload my downloaded zip (has t

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

Hmm scanned now my System with a linux distro, nothing found strange. nimsuggest.exe reports as virus too if i try to install nim.

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

The title says it all. I just downloaded nim-1.4.6_x64.zip, and made a check. nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B Does anyone else has this? Thank you, G.

nim-1.4.6_x64.zip/bin/nimble.exe reports as Trojan:Win32/Zpevdo.B

Or perhaps I should be worried... God damn :(

Need help implementing bind for C for webview.h

oh golly but your bindCProc is a closure! that shouldn't work, how is that working

Need help implementing bind for C for webview.h

i can replicate that error with clang, but gcc works.

How to access n theJS backend Bootstrap's "modal" method?

To have Nim call it correctly you could define it like this: proc modal(obj: ModalElement, options = "") {.importcpp: "#.modal(#)".} Run

Need help implementing bind for C for webview.h

Thank for the answers. Sadly I'm still stuck with another error. Trouble for me, is my lack of understanding of C/C++ is dragging me down. TBH, I can't really comment on the error message. How I read it, I just don't understand why it can't match the function. For example, with the current cha