I would like to know if there is any objection to having a `cstring` type as
key instead of `string`.
I currently use the `string` type, but to avoid transforming it, I'd like to
use `cstring` directly.
I'm wondering because in a paragraph on Hashing in the nim help `tables`
section, it is sti
Thank you for your prompt reply.
Well the hash table does not take ownership of the `cstring` keys which could
be exactly what you want. There is a specialized version of `hash` for
`cstring` so go right ahead, it should just work.
