Crap. You're right. I ding-donnged that. Thanks!
As always, _PLEASE_ help spread the word by liking and sharing on social media!
Ex:
[Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/nim/comments/5ebn5o/nim_in_action_is_going_into_production/),
[Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/software.libman.org/posts/589468044578512),
[Twitter](https://twitter.com/libm
Nothing wrong here with `and`. Probably just what you want is `or` (if you want
to combine 4 values with disjoint bits into 1).
I'm trying to map my "quadruplet" object to an unsigned 32-bit number, that is
supposed to represent an RGBA pixel. I'm able to convert my floating point
quadruplet values to their respective R, G, B, and A components, but when I try
to do an and on all of the components, I'm getting a 0. Here i
So when I understood you correctly, you want to have a symbolic representation
of the distribution, so that you can do symbolic transformations on them, but I
am not sure about it. Then you should specify, if your distributions are is
something known at compile time, or something that depends on
Well, it is just that apparently installing the release version (the one on the
download page) requires less RAM and works there :)
I use annotation macros in C to generate new C code from the AST.
For example in C, where the X macro uses the GNU annotate attribute, I do the
following:
// Type definition (can access fields from script)
X(script) typedef struct {
int value;
} something_t; // yes I k
So, I started working with concepts, which are awesome, and I ran across a use
case that seems like it should work, but fails to compile. Basically, we see
concrete types as subtypes of concepts they match in most cases, but it seems
like they are not handled the same way when they themselves ar
