Hi, I'm trying to interface some C library where the library function accepts a
function pointer for callbacks.
proc libfun(fun:proc(x:pointer; n:ptr cint)) {.importc:"libfun",
header:"mylib.h".}
I'm trying to write this `fun` proc in Nim, and pass it to `libfun`. How do I
t
Thank you for the explanation.
Yes, I'm really with you on the idea of enforcing the coding style.
I'm not fully sure yet, but looks like I'm having a case where it would be
better (for the sake of simpler/clearer software design) to distinguish symbols
basing on the filesystem path.
Wait a moment, are you shure this D code is equivalent to the Nim code you just
posted?
struct Bar { void bar() { "bar".writeln; } }
To me this looks like just a _method_ (in c++ terms). And a _method_ is not a
value member of a struct. In other words it does not increase the
It will probably be solved:
* After all other higher-priority features/bugs are solved
* When someone contributes a patch that resolves the ambiguity
It's not really a big problem. Just use "foo[T](42)" or "foo(42)[T]". I don't
think it warrants a syntax change.
