Thank you. Fixed.
I coded in Delphi, like 20 years ago. If it was my inspiration, then it must
have been "unconcious"...
Turn of your OS's memory overcommitment.
> This seems like a clear compiler error.
On the contrary, it looks like a clear programming bug / OOM.
> I have no idea why it's doing that, or how to fix it.
A full example we can compile would be helpful.
So I'm compiling some new code in 0.18.0.
This code code compiles and runs correctly as one process with no problems.
proc segsieve(Kn: int) = # for Kn resgroups|bytes in segment
...
for indx in 0..5: # for nextp row indexes,
var r =
Isn't it
// foo.h
struct foo
{
void (*bar)(int *fuz);
};
or is it a c++ header ?
Anyway, you can try something like this
type
foo {.importc:"foo", header:"foo.h"} = object
bar: proc(fuz: var cint) {.cdecl.}
There are actually "filters" and "parsers" and "standard" means the standard
indentation based syntax/parser. Which is also the default and so the `|
standard` part can be left out.
Fair enough, I guess.
I guess the difference is that the meaning of () is disambiguated on the
grammar level (or at least I hope that Nim's grammar is unambiguous), while the
meaning of . depends on the semantics of a given piece of code, which depend on
the context (not that I consider it enough of a problem to
This thread has turned off-topic and so I'm going to lock it (any further posts
to this thread will be deleted).
@libman I would kindly ask you to stop derailing threads into ramblings about
how GitHub is communist and other such topics, stick to Nim please. I dislike
removing posts so I will
So? `()` is used for function calls as well as for grouping expressions.
I can understand aedt rationale. The dot is already used to access objects
members. aedt idea made things clearer for me. But maybe I misunderstood the
real semantic of these expressions. Anyway, thanks for the tip Araq.
Yeah, that's pretty much what I expected from you. Your entire strategy is to
churn out extremely long-winded rants that barely address the core of the
issue, **going as far as to respond to earlier posts that have nothing to do
with the current discussion, or posts that you 've already
I'm reading the documentation trying to understand source code filters. (
[https://nim-lang.org/docs/filters.html](https://nim-lang.org/docs/filters.html)
)
Some of the examples have this line at the top
#? stdtmpl | standard
I don't understand what the word 'standard'
This forum is Araq's property, so this conversation here is over. Please don't
reply, as this thread getting bumped would increase its annoyance.
I apologise that I've gotten drawn into a debate where it isn't appropriate.
I'm confident that I've made a correct, complete, and thorough argument
@Libman: Which of the following statements do you disagree with?
* If Bob writes some code (assume he isn't doing so on behalf of anyone
else), Bob is producing something that can only be attributed to him
* You are **not** automatically entitled to use stuff produced by others
* If you
Maybe like this, but it's a bad idea:
template `::`*(a, b: untyped): untyped = a.b
> And how can I export this operator across the whole project so I don't have
> to import the module that defines this every time?
Via an `--import:"my_ugly_scope_operator"` in your
Save the posts you consider valuable somewhere else for I might delete this
whole thread.
Dear StasB,
First and foremost, please note that **I am criticizing your argument** against
my position on NAP and "copyfree"dom advocacy, **not you personally**.
Also please keep in mind that this isn't a fully off-topic discussion for this
forum, because Nim's ecosystem ranks #1 in
from documentation page:
[https://nim-lang.org/documentation.html](https://nim-lang.org/documentation.html)
Tools Documentation
[https://nim-lang.org/docs/tools.html](https://nim-lang.org/docs/tools.html)
is broken
19 matches
Mail list logo
