Secifically, in `~/nim-0.18.0/compiler/vmdef.nim` set `MaxLoopIterations* =
1_000_000_000` (1 Billion)
then rebuild sysem: `./koch boot -d:release`
This post mentioned that
[https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/3658/1#22788](https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/3658/1#22788)
The max instruction number has been increased since 0.18.0, it's gone from 1.5
million to 1 billion. However this release is not out yet
Hey, wanted to ask whether it is possible to increase the number of possible
ctfe iterations. For example:
proc f(): int =
var c = 0
for i in 0..10:
c += 1
return c
proc g():int =
for i in 0..100: result += f()
const
This is shorter and a bit more clean in my opinion
var a: cstring = ""
let a_ptr = cast[ByteAddress](a)
echo a_ptr
I need to get the pointer, then set the pointer to a struct. So I cannot just
use FFI.
+1, mratsim.
What I want is convenience and still catering for people who wanted more
performance for low level stuff. Convenient and practical.
@aedt I think it's a question of resources.
Given the current promising state it would be better to release now, garnering
interest and goodwill and probably new hands to help on ironing bugs and use
cases that the current tiny community doesn't need in my opinion.
Also that allows those with
Controversial opinion but I'll just leave it out there because I'm a fan of Nim:
Halt Nim 1.0 until Nim 2.0 destructors suggested in
[https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/wiki/Destructors](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/wiki/Destructors)
is standardized. Eventually for systems programming people
I have been using Nim to write an interpreter for a toy language named "Lox".
Its been a fun project so far.
[https://github.com/cabhishek/nimlox](https://github.com/cabhishek/nimlox)
10 matches
Mail list logo
