Two comments, one about nim, one about C:
(1) Whether nim has a future or not depends primarily on active development AND
user adoption. The second part can be very difficult, since you have to compete
with other languages; and a large user size counts a lot. I know too little
about nim to eval
I just read that dom prefers "I want a vote" or "I don't want a vote", but
actually I don't really care about the style insensitivity either way. I think
many people who dislike it do so largely because they think of it as "impure"
for people to have to care about style sensitivity (e. g. you ar
PMunch wrote:
> And after having had to write some code in C and Ruby that doesn't have it
> I'm > even more for it.
I can not speak for C but in ruby you can make use of aliases.
So:
> def foo_bar end; alias foobar foo_bar
This may be excessive to want to do so manually but you could batch-g
Personally I do not care either way. To me the issue of case sensitivity or not
has never been one that existed.
For me personally the biggest problem is time :D - however had, past that
point, I may wish to be able to use a "sub-dialect" of nim that is more
light-weight in syntax. For example,
PS: Can we not edit our own posts? I did want to edit it to clarify what I
meant ... but I can not see an edit-button or so. I only see "reply", a heart
icon, and the time ... quite strange forum here. Is it written in nim? :) I
swear this also changes every some months... :P
> For me, coding is a hobby
For me too. My biggest issue altogether is lack of time. Ruby is my main
language but I do not even get to write as much code a I once did, simply
because I don't have the time. I still write code to solve things though, many
trivial things that come up every day.
>
Is there a way to get something in Nim similar to rubygems.org? With specific
descriptions of projects too?
I remember dom96 has had something like that but it was a bit cumbersome to use
(e. g. compared to how I use rubygems.org).
What I plan to do in the long run is, if addons exist in nim, i
I have no real preference either way, but personally I use Markdown a lot in
ruby and also in my local files.
I do not even use markdown directly for ruby, but instead have a template
ending with .gen, and a ruby script then expands this with more information
when I upload a gem in ruby.
What
> OP is exactly about that: if Araq is busy or absent, this should not put the
> > whole project to a halt
In Ruby you have to discuss specific feature requests on the bug tracker; and
matz is the final authority for approving or rejecting.
I do agree in regards to bugs and fixes to documentati
I do not feel that the CoC's add anything meaningful or relevant.
They are unnecessary in my opinion.
It usually is about censorship and "rules to effect censorship".
In this context though, while I dislike CoC's, your wording but also your nick
is a dead-give away NastyRigger. For some reason
10 matches
Mail list logo
