@bahm:
could you please add links to IRC logs for discussions already happened?
I see a post for the first time, so it is likely has been blocked.
Couple of thoughts in loud:
In Nim expressions have already a proper type, no need wrap then into `let|var`
assignments. `for x in [1, 2, 3, 4]: if x mod 2 == 0: x else: x + 1` should be
a already valid.
I think it makes sense
I'm surprised no one replied to your thread yet.
The goal is to have "for" be a expression so it could sit on the right-hand
side of an assignment.
I'm not sure how it will be in practice for the: initialization - for loop -
return
Before we begin: I'm new to Nim and it's been a while since I did anything to
do with AST, parsing, etc. so my suggestions may be whacky. If they are, simply
say so and turn the discussion in the right direction.
**Where we're at**
List comprehension is currently available through the _future_
