> I don't think your code is standard though, usually void are implicit in the
> return type, also var are used for in-place mutation, not pointers.
Thanks for letting me know, I haven't written a lot of Nim so I'm still
learning. I didn't realise that using var means in-place mutation, I've
History.
I don't think your code is standard though, usually void are implicit in the
return type, also `var` are used for in-place mutation, not pointers. And it's
probably much more likely to read from an immutable value (often an int or byte
array) to a mutable value (often a byte array or
Is there a reason why the endians
([https://nim-lang.org/docs/endians.html](https://nim-lang.org/docs/endians.html))
library is written as it is rather than providing a familiar and more user
friendly interface? I've written something more conventional and IMO easier to
use ...
