Re: Few mixed up questions

2018-05-07 Thread ErikCampobadal
Thanks a lot for the answers in here, made the questions clear! Still without understanding the "untyped" one tho. Thanks!

Re: Few mixed up questions

2018-05-04 Thread Hlaaftana
About templates, they're like C macros, a simple way to do metaprogramming without manually building syntax like in Nim macros. They're not like procs in that they aren't called at runtime, they simply exist during compile time and transform AST given to its parameters. An `untyped` parameter is

Re: Few mixed up questions

2018-05-03 Thread DTxplorer
To use C code in Nim I compile the C files with -c option (on GCC), then I use {.link: "your_binary.o".} pragma in Nim files and simple {.importc.} for each function or type. Maybe there is uses cases where importing headers is necessary but I haven't encontered this case for the moment. (maybe

Re: Few mixed up questions

2018-05-03 Thread mratsim
My own spin: 1\. Object are allocated on the stack while ref objects are allocated on the heap by the garbage collector. `let a = foo` will copy the object in the first case but will copy the reference to the object in the second case, so `a` and `foo` are completely distinct for object but the

Re: Few mixed up questions

2018-05-03 Thread mashingan
I'll answer to best what I know * 1\. object is preferable if you want value-type, while ref object is for reference-type (it's obvious from the name tho, ). I usually use reference-type when it's costly to create it such as IO, Files, memory etc. When using ref object, new is required altho

Few mixed up questions

2018-05-03 Thread ErikCampobadal
Hello! Been using nim for a few days, been reading a lot and feel really happy right now! Few questions (I myself come from high level languages although I've used few c) 1\. What is best to use: ref object or object and why. If using ref object, is "new" always needed? 2\. What's the differe