As Nim grows , there will be the need of a management structure
and the sooner this is implemented the better the foundation
for future growth will be.
An example of this could be :
[http://www.firebirdsql.org/en/firebird-foundation](http://forum.nim-lang.org///www.firebirdsql.org/en/firebird-f
> Whats your take on this Araq and lead developers?
Well you can buy commercial support and we have BountySource, apart from that
I'm kinda out of ideas. More risky things don't work well for me since I have
children to feed. And I am rushing v1 now so that "cannot use it in production,
not v1"
I think it depends on the community. If more people hear/use Nim then bigger
companies would follow. The problem however, is that there are allot of
programming languages that have already proven them self. To blend in and prove
that Nim is beter, is hard. Also, Nim is still not version 1.0. The
I hear docker is written by Golang and the distributed storage system of
Dropbox is writting from Golang to Rust.
I hope there will be some similar large-scale popular systems are written by
Nim.
Compared to other languages (D Rust Golang Scala), I feel Nim is very close to
perfect.
Free money is nice. I'm sure no one here will turn it down. :P
It seems that everyone has some Big Ideas for Araq, which isn't always helpful
because these ideas pile more and more effort in his already overloaded plate.
(I have a zillion ideas too, and not enough time to follow through on any o
These day , i saw a few opensource projects getting funding not just from
grants , but also from VC and angels. [Ipython , anaconda , swift based
webframework- perfect , RethinkDB , Docker] to name a few. Current bounty
source campaign going well but 1400$ won't be enough make it a serious proje
