Re: [Nix-dev] Experiences with Nvidia Optimus?

2012-02-05 Thread Mathijs Kwik
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Arie Middelkoop wrote: > On 16-01-12 13:35, Mathijs Kwik wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Arie Middelkoop >>  wrote: >>> >>> Does any of you have experience with getting hardware acceleration for >>> >>> nvidia optimus laptop videocards (e.g. GT555M) t

[Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - r32037 - nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/tools/graphics/enblend-enfuse

2012-02-05 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Author: urkud Date: Sun Feb 5 09:26:06 2012 New Revision: 32037 URL: https://nixos.org/websvn/nix/?rev=32037&sc=1 Log: enblend-enfuse-4.0 Modified: nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/tools/graphics/enblend-enfuse/default.nix Modified: nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/tools/graphics/enblend-enfuse/default.nix

[Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - r32038 - nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/top-level

2012-02-05 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Author: urkud Date: Sun Feb 5 09:26:11 2012 New Revision: 32038 URL: https://nixos.org/websvn/nix/?rev=32038&sc=1 Log: Whitespace Modified: nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix Modified: nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix ==

[Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - r32039 - nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/development/libraries/qhull

2012-02-05 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Author: urkud Date: Sun Feb 5 09:26:15 2012 New Revision: 32039 URL: https://nixos.org/websvn/nix/?rev=32039&sc=1 Log: qhull-2012.1 Modified: nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/development/libraries/qhull/default.nix Modified: nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/development/libraries/qhull/default.nix ==

Re: [Nix-dev] Experiences with Nvidia Optimus?

2012-02-05 Thread Arie Middelkoop
On 05-02-12 09:16, Mathijs Kwik wrote: > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Arie Middelkoop wrote: >> The main advantage of the package actually arises when you don't use the >> card: it uses ACPI to shutdown the card, which - depending on what card you >> have - saves quite a bit of energy / heat.

Re: [Nix-dev] Experiences with Nvidia Optimus?

2012-02-05 Thread Mathijs Kwik
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Arie Middelkoop wrote: > On 05-02-12 09:16, Mathijs Kwik wrote: >> >> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Arie Middelkoop >>  wrote: > > >>> The main advantage of the package actually arises when you don't use the >>> card: it uses ACPI to shutdown the card, which - de

[Nix-dev] upgrades and new packages

2012-02-05 Thread Mathijs Kwik
Hi all, I packaged up my local changes. Can someone please be so kind to commit them for me? normal upgrades: ghc-mod [1] uhc [2] emacs-w3m [3] v8 and node.js [4] new packages: i7z [5] frandom [6] + nixos module [7] new nixos modules: nvidia-optimus [8] fixes/patches: My mongodb upstart task

[Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - r32040 - nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/top-level

2012-02-05 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Author: urkud Date: Sun Feb 5 18:29:42 2012 New Revision: 32040 URL: https://nixos.org/websvn/nix/?rev=32040&sc=1 Log: Move gtkLibs to top-level namespace Earlier there was a strict correspondence between versions of gtkLibs.* but now upstream moves to gtk-3.x, and there is no simple rule anymor

Re: [Nix-dev] [PATCH] Move gtkLibs to top-level namespace

2012-02-05 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: > Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: > >> From: "Yury G. Kudryashov" >> >> Earlier there was a strict correspondence between versions of gtkLibs.* >> but now upstream moves to gtk-3.x, and there is no simple rule anymore. >> Thus it is easier to override particular libs on a c

Re: [Nix-dev] upgrades and new packages

2012-02-05 Thread Arie Middelkoop
On 05-02-12 16:40, Mathijs Kwik wrote: > [11] > I don't know if there's a policy for licensed commercial software (of > which the binaries aren't freely downloadable), > but I packaged a nice game and I learned a bit about rpath and > binaries under nixos doing so. > The nix expression might serve

Re: [Nix-dev] upgrades and new packages

2012-02-05 Thread Александр Цамутали
Mathijs Kwik writes: > [11] > I don't know if there's a policy for licensed commercial software (of > which the binaries aren't freely downloadable), > but I packaged a nice game and I learned a bit about rpath and > binaries under nixos doing so. > The nix expression might serve as an example fo

[Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - r32042 - in nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs: os-specific/linux/microcode top-level

2012-02-05 Thread Arie Middelkoop
runk/pkgs/os-specific/linux/microcode/converter.nixSun Feb 5 20:44:19 2012(r32042) @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +{ stdenv, fetchurl }: + +stdenv.mkDerivation { + name = "microcode2ucode-20120205"; + src = fetchurl { +url = "http://gentoo-overlays.zugaina.org/gentoo/portage

[Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - r32043 - nixpkgs/branches/glib-2.30/pkgs/development/libraries/pango

2012-02-05 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Author: urkud Date: Sun Feb 5 21:00:42 2012 New Revision: 32043 URL: https://nixos.org/websvn/nix/?rev=32043&sc=1 Log: pango-1.29: use fetchurl Modified: nixpkgs/branches/glib-2.30/pkgs/development/libraries/pango/1.29.x.nix Modified: nixpkgs/branches/glib-2.30/pkgs/development/libraries/pan

[Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - r32044 - in nixpkgs/branches/glib-2.30/pkgs: development/libraries/gtk+ top-level

2012-02-05 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Author: urkud Date: Sun Feb 5 21:00:45 2012 New Revision: 32044 URL: https://nixos.org/websvn/nix/?rev=32044&sc=1 Log: Move gtkLibs3x to top-level namespace, gtk+-3.2.3 Modified: nixpkgs/branches/glib-2.30/pkgs/development/libraries/gtk+/3.2.x.nix nixpkgs/branches/glib-2.30/pkgs/top-level/

[Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - r32045 - in nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs: applications/misc/goldendict top-level

2012-02-05 Thread Alexander Tsamutali
Author: astsmtl Date: Sun Feb 5 21:02:27 2012 New Revision: 32045 URL: https://nixos.org/websvn/nix/?rev=32045&sc=1 Log: applications/misc/goldendict: New nixpkg. Added: nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/applications/misc/goldendict/ nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/applications/misc/goldendict/default.nix nixpkgs/

Re: [Nix-dev] Nix(OS) on upcoming sprints/events

2012-02-05 Thread Florian Friesdorf
Hi Marc, On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:57:30 +0100, Marc Weber wrote: > > Hi Florian Friesdorf, > > I'd like to remind you that I did some alternative work which you may > want to have a look at. Eg I solved the pygtk issue in a different way. I had a look at it and can tell that it is a different a

Re: [Nix-dev] upgrades and new packages

2012-02-05 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Arie Middelkoop wrote: > On 05-02-12 16:40, Mathijs Kwik wrote: >> [11] >> I don't know if there's a policy for licensed commercial software (of >> which the binaries aren't freely downloadable), >> but I packaged a nice game and I learned a bit about rpath and >> binaries under nixos doing so. >>

Re: [Nix-dev] Experiences with Nvidia Optimus?

2012-02-05 Thread Arie Middelkoop
On 05-02-12 11:48, Mathijs Kwik wrote: > I haven't seen (or needed) microcode related stuff since then, but I > got curious after your commit. > > A quick look at archlinux gives: > http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk?h=packages/intel-ucode > > In other words: you are rig

Re: [Nix-dev] Nix(OS) on upcoming sprints/events

2012-02-05 Thread Marc Weber
Excerpts from Florian Friesdorf's message of Sun Feb 05 22:31:21 +0100 2012: > It would be great to have your know-how about that! Would you be > interested to help with another approach and join us for at least a > couple of days? I don't do python - and I don't think I'm coding much python soon.

Re: [Nix-dev] Nix(OS) on upcoming sprints/events

2012-02-05 Thread Florian Friesdorf
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:27:16 +0100, Marc Weber wrote: > Excerpts from Florian Friesdorf's message of Sun Feb 05 22:31:21 +0100 2012: > > It would be great to have your know-how about that! Would you be > > interested to help with another approach and join us for at least a > > couple of days? > I

Re: [Nix-dev] Nix(OS) on upcoming sprints/events

2012-02-05 Thread Marc Weber
Excerpts from Florian Friesdorf's message of Mon Feb 06 03:26:46 +0100 2012: > So far your approach did not find acceptance to be used for nixpkgs > trunk Not sure what your statement is based on. It not being in trunk? ... No wonder that its not accepted because it depends on my 'arbitary strings

[Nix-dev] nixpkgs and external package databases

2012-02-05 Thread Florian Friesdorf
Hi, the topic was brought already but I could not find a conclusive answer to it - if I missed it, I would be glad if you could point me to it. We have hackage, pypi, marmalade, cpan, ctan and probably many more - all databases of packages for some language or tool. How do we want to handle them

[Nix-dev] security advisory check

2012-02-05 Thread Florian Friesdorf
Hi, ssc is working on a tool to check packages against security advisories From various sources. He'd like to include support for nix and we were looking at: find /nix/var/nix/profiles -type l |xargs nix-store --query --tree and: find /nix/store -type d -maxdepth 1 Both include things that ar

[Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - r32046 - nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/tools/misc/fontforge

2012-02-05 Thread Michael Raskin
Author: raskin Date: Mon Feb 6 05:49:27 2012 New Revision: 32046 URL: https://nixos.org/websvn/nix/?rev=32046&sc=1 Log: A kludge to avoid removal of zlib from RPATH -- needed for LilyPond build Modified: nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/tools/misc/fontforge/default.nix Modified: nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/tools/m

[Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - r32047 - in configurations/trunk/misc/raskin: . lesser-expressions

2012-02-05 Thread Michael Raskin
Author: raskin Date: Mon Feb 6 06:03:04 2012 New Revision: 32047 URL: https://nixos.org/websvn/nix/?rev=32047&sc=1 Log: Configuration before a larger rebuild Modified: configurations/trunk/misc/raskin/lesser-expressions/raskin-user.nix configurations/trunk/misc/raskin/package-groups.nix