Hi,
I noticed that builders now often complain that hashes of some path have
changed, e.g.: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/6151693
I'm not sure how these conditions are checked, but IMO it could be
dangerous to have modified paths in Hydra's store.
By my estimate, in the last 1-2 days there
Qt5 was released a few days ago. I thought it would be a good idea to add
it to NixPkgs.
Here is the nix expressions that compiles all of the libraries as well as
all the examples. I've tried to enable all of the options
HI,
Thanks for sharing this helpful derivation.
I am willing to build
Hi Vladimír,
I noticed that builders now often complain that hashes of some path
have changed, e.g.: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/6151693
I believe that this is an issue with GHC, not with Hydra. GHC cannot
guarantee that two identical builds of itself yield identical results:
Helo Baptist,
No, I did not update the qt5 expression and have not built it in a long time.
Cheers,
Jos
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
On 09/20/2013 07:19 PM, Peter Simons wrote:
Maybe two build slaves ended up building GHC 7.6.3 independently from each
other,
and now we have two mutually incompatible GHC binaries lying around on the
Hydra cluster?
Ah, that didn't occur to me. I didn't even notice it was all haskell.
