On 04/22/2014 01:12 AM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
Hi,
My OpenGL seems to be rather broken.
When I first start my X session (currently boots into KDE), things using
OpenGL do render, but they have problems:
In the game Tibia, things that don't need refreshing every frame (the UI
and
Greetings,
As OSS is not packaged (yet), ALSA and pulseaudio seemed like the next
step. As usual with pulseaudio it means a lot of tears.
After a while I managed to have separate ‘mpv’ instances to play
together nicely by using an override with pulseSupport = true.
I have a problem if I try to
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:08:40PM +0200, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
On 04/22/2014 01:12 AM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
Hi,
My OpenGL seems to be rather broken.
I had since bought a dedicated nVidia graphics card and no longer have
the problem.
I'd still love to know how to tell NixOS
On 04/25/2014 10:17 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
Greetings,
As OSS is not packaged (yet), ALSA and pulseaudio seemed like the next
step. As usual with pulseaudio it means a lot of tears.
After a while I managed to have separate ‘mpv’ instances to play
together nicely by using an override
On 04/25/2014 10:17 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:08:40PM +0200, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
On 04/22/2014 01:12 AM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
Hi,
My OpenGL seems to be rather broken.
I had since bought a dedicated nVidia graphics card and no longer have
the
On 24 April 2014 10:22, Eelco Dolstra eelco.dols...@logicblox.com wrote:
Hi,
On 23/04/14 22:57, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
On 23 April 2014 22:47, Bjørn Forsman bjorn.fors...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Any ideas about 1) when/why nix started doing negative caching by
default and 2) why nix-store
On 24 April 2014 10:18, Peter Simons sim...@cryp.to wrote:
Hi Bjørn,
maybe adding --option build-cache-failure false on the command line
helps? I haven't tried it though, just a thought ...
Now that I know how to clear failed paths, here is my experience with
--option build-cache-failures
Hello
tl;dr I can verify with a very simple nix expression that the builder indeed
is root, and not one of the nixbld users. I think this is not as it should
be.
Any idea what I am doing wrong?
Details follow:
Here is the test expression:
{stdenv, coreutils}: stdenv.mkDerivation {
name =
