Re: [Nix-dev] setfacl: /var/log/journal: Operation not supported

2014-06-04 Thread Ricardo M. Correia
Hi Christian, If the problem is indeed the setfacl failure (as it appears to be), I think you need to enable ACLs in ZFS by doing: "zfs set acltype=posixacl ", where is the ZFS dataset/filesystem which contains your systemd journal. I'm not sure if the default ZFS version (0.6.2) contains the a

Re: [Nix-dev] Error on creating hoogle database (permission denied)

2014-06-04 Thread John Wiegley
> Thomas Strobel writes: > I was trying to create a hoogle database with 'hoogle data', but there > is no way to specify where to write the database to. So I get the > following error: > '' > hoogle: > /nix/store/jl9j7s3s69q8l1imr9caxbxfc4cpg2g9-haskell-hoogle-ghc7.6.3-4.2.32/share/hoogle-4.2

[Nix-dev] setfacl: /var/log/journal: Operation not supported

2014-06-04 Thread _1126
Hello all! I recently re-installed my NixOS configuration on a ZFS root. Since then I am unable to access systemd's journal. My user is part of the systemd-journal group, but the journal file aint. -rw-r- 1 root root 117440512 Jun 4 14:07 system.journal This is might be due to the the error

Re: [Nix-dev] New website

2014-06-04 Thread Jason O'Conal
On 4 Jun 2014, at 7:27 am, Wout Mertens wrote: > > I really don't like that Nixpkgs is being buried in favor of NixOS. More > people using Nixpkgs => more bugs found+fixed, more packages, newer versions, > more switches to NixOS. > > Nixpkgs is a stepping stone. > > Why point Homebrew users t

Re: [Nix-dev] Using Nixpkgs outside of NixOS

2014-06-04 Thread Michael Raskin
>Hm, I wasn't following the kernel ml on this, but from the systemd's >document it follows that there has to be _exactly one_ writer to this >filesystem and this is a restriction forced by the kernel. systemd's >decision is that it will be PID 1, not some other process. On non-systemd >systems that

Re: [Nix-dev] Using Nixpkgs outside of NixOS

2014-06-04 Thread Kirill Elagin
Hm, I wasn't following the kernel ml on this, but from the systemd's document it follows that there has to be _exactly one_ writer to this filesystem and this is a restriction forced by the kernel. systemd's decision is that it will be PID 1, not some other process. On non-systemd systems that can

Re: [Nix-dev] Using Nixpkgs outside of NixOS

2014-06-04 Thread Michael Raskin
>too bad :-) Thanks for the find! By the way, note that PID-1-only cgroups management is a systemd decision, as far as I understand from the kernel mailing list posts, the interface will still be a filesystem, and apparently it is OK to implement cgroup management by multiple root processes (i.e

Re: [Nix-dev] Using Nixpkgs outside of NixOS

2014-06-04 Thread Wout Mertens
too bad :-) Thanks for the find! On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Kirill Elagin wrote: > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/ControlGroupInterface/ > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/core/main.c#n1469 > > > -- > Кирилл Елагин > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:21 A