You can import a package from a specific version of nixpkgs, independent of
the rest of your build, though it's a bit of a manual process.
First, check on Hydra which Git revision it is that you want to build (you
can see this on the Inputs tab, 144d13cf2cc6de28f8abe9e9e8c98f28ccf8fc59 in
this cas
Hi Rok,
Thanks for reply. How should I fetch it? I mean how to tell the system to
use that particular build? Currently, when I say nixos-rebuild {boot |
switch} it assumes that that (which again I am not sure which one
it refers to when I have to two channels listed) would tell it the right
hash
you can fetch mesos directly from hydra
http://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixos/trunk-combined/nixpkgs.mesos.x86_64-linux
check latest successful build for instructions.
Quoting rohit yadav (2015-12-08 03:54:05)
> One more question. Is it possible to add two channels? Say one unstable and
> one
> pr
Quoting Arseniy Seroka (2015-12-06 20:29:58)
> Greetings, friends and colleagues.
>
> This is a joint letter by me and Jonn Mostovoy, co-founders of
> Serokell, regarding the state of security in NixOS and a roadmap of fixing it.
>
> Hopefully, all of us are using NixOS in our companies, however
One more question. Is it possible to add two channels? Say one unstable and
one previous stable channel and choose module from one of them?
Thanks.
Rohit
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:47 PM, rohit yadav
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently Mesos package is broken on nixos-unstable channel, therefore, I
> cann
Coincidentally, Jonathan Fischoff (@jfischoff) is talking about
hardening concerns on twitter, he points out that there is already
discussion and work regarding that —
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/7220
—
Kindest regards,
¬Σ
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:12 PM, wrote:
> On Monday, Decembe
Quoting Bjørn Forsman (2015-12-07 20:45:49)
> On 7 December 2015 at 17:36, Tomasz Czyż wrote:
> > https://www.bountysource.com/search?query=nixos - maybe this is good enough,
> > no? Just needs a little more advertisement :-)
>
> I added some bounties :-)
>
I think for bounties of smaller size
Hi,
Currently Mesos package is broken on nixos-unstable channel, therefore, I
cannot install it on my server. Is there a way to install a previous
successful build?
Thanks,
Rohit
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.
On 7 December 2015 at 17:36, Tomasz Czyż wrote:
> https://www.bountysource.com/search?query=nixos - maybe this is good enough,
> no? Just needs a little more advertisement :-)
I added some bounties :-)
Best regards,
Bjørn Forsman
___
nix-dev mailing li
On 07-12-2015 16:36:50, Tomasz Czyż wrote:
> https://www.bountysource.com/search?query=nixos - maybe this is good
> enough, no? Just needs a little more advertisement :-)
This points to the old nixos package repository (github.com/nixos/nixos <- why
does this still exist???) - I'd consider this si
https://www.bountysource.com/search?query=nixos - maybe this is good
enough, no? Just needs a little more advertisement :-)
2015-12-07 16:33 GMT+00:00 Thomas Hunger :
> There's the foundation https://nixos.org/nixos/foundation.html which
> would be a great structure to collect and direct money.
>
There's the foundation https://nixos.org/nixos/foundation.html which would
be a great structure to collect and direct money.
Eelco - I'm not sure where to look so I couldn't find anything about the
foundation's activity. Do you keep meeting notes somewhere online?
best,
Tom
On 7 December 2015
On Monday, December 07, 2015 11:14:14 zimbatm wrote:
> (2) might be a bit difficult. I'm not sure NixOS has enough popularity yet
> to gather that kind of funding. Also it means going into politics for
> example to decide which set of packages are security-supported. That being
> said, we could go
Hi all,
I've been a Nix/NixOS user for a few years now. While some parts of
NixOS are moving forward rather quickly (awesome!), some of the Nix
tooling is improving painfully slow (IMHO). I was wondering if any
core devs have considered starting a fundraiser to possibly work
full-time on some issu
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015, at 12:14 PM, zimbatm wrote:
> [...]
> (3) is already supported by adding `security.grsecurity.enable` to your
> configuration.nix file.
To be frank, grsecurity support in NixOS is user-unfriendly. My biggest
gripe is that the implementation is biased towards compile-time tuning
Hi Seroka,
just a couple of idea:
(1) is really cool but could also be solved by having faster builds and
binary diffs. I really liked the presentation at NixCon and think that it's
a really cool hack but don't understand all of the implications. Just as an
anecdote; ruby has had a release with a
16 matches
Mail list logo
