On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Roger Qiu wrote:
> ```
> { pkgs }: { # pkgs is the fully configured packages, after overrides
>packageOverrides = super: let self = super.pkgs; in rec { # super is
> without overrides, self is with
> # ... overrides go here ...
>
As a nixos newbie I'll weigh in. Installed nixos during the previous
weekend, having been on gentoo for some years.
There's been some getting used to the nix language, and defining
everything in the .nix configs instead of files in /etc/. Also, systemd
is a strange beast; not sure how I feel
Hello nix-dev,
As the KDE 5 maintainer, I am issuing a warning that the KDE 5 startup
sequence is broken in Nixpkgs master and probably in the unstable
channel, too. If you are a KDE 5 user, I recommend that you use with
NixOS 16.03 for now. I haven't updated the KDE packages since the
16.03
Ah, okay... there was my fault. Thank you!
On 13-04-2016 22:08:08, Eric Sagnes wrote:
> The following seems to work:
>
> ```
> let
> qs = l:
> if l == [] then []
> else
> with builtins;
> let x = head l;
> xs = tail l;
> low = filter (a: a < x) xs;
>
The following seems to work:
```
let
qs = l:
if l == [] then []
else
with builtins;
let x = head l;
xs = tail l;
low = filter (a: a < x) xs;
high = filter (a: a >= x) xs;
in low ++ [x] ++ high;
in
qs [3 4 1 2]
```
I think you get
Hi,
I struggle implementing quicksort in the nix expression language... maybe one of
you gurus can help me? Here's what I have so far:
let
len= xs: builtins.length xs;
fst= xs: builtins.head xs;
lower = x: xs: builtins.filter (a: a < x) xs;
higher =
Vladimír Čunát writes:
> It's these various quirks, I believe. Mostly less important edge cases.
> They come from having much less testers and contributors than Debian
> (for example) and from deviating on some commonly assumed points, e.g.
> shared directories for all plugins
On 04/13/2016 10:32 AM, stewart mackenzie wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
>> What kind of numbers? (on what?)
>
> numbers on closure size reduction
When I measured a few months ago, I came with these nice examples:
– gtk2 libs: 520 -> 120 MB,
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
> What kind of numbers? (on what?)
numbers on closure size reduction
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
On 04/13/2016 09:53 AM, stewart mackenzie wrote:
> On 13 Apr 2016 15:41, "Vladimír Čunát" wrote:
>> For example, the texlive change had more impact on me in this respect,
>> as depending on TeX stuff is rather seldom and mostly through executing
>> TeX utilities.
>
> Do you
On 04/09/2016 09:59 PM, Saša Janiška wrote:
>> I wouldn't recommend NixOS to non-developers, our stable releases are
>> still a lot less stable than Debian testing.
>
> In which sense is that ’less stability’ manifested?
It's these various quirks, I believe. Mostly less important edge cases.
It's in master now! It seems to bring a few hundred build regressions,
but that shouldn't be a problem to resolve within several weeks.
> This is awesome, really a milestone :-)
The reductions seem large on some packages, but personally I was rather
disappointed by the fact that my desktop has
Hi Nix'ers,
No one? Im I the only one who's experiencing this?
This timeout still occurs and makes every call to systemctl at least 30
seconds slower, pretty annoying actually..
Hope someone with understanding can shed some light on what might be going
on here.
Erik
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at
13 matches
Mail list logo