.nix available
similarly to how a rec-expression would.
However, the names introduced by with have lower priority than those
introduced by other means. For instance,
let as = { x = "foo"; y = "bar"; }; y = "baz";
in with as; x + y
evaluates to &quo
it says the whole set is
introduced into the lexical scope.
So what's going on here? Using Nix 1.11.2 if it matters.
Cheers,
Harald van Dijk
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
On 19/04/16 18:51, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 04:01 PM, Layus wrote:
>> That operator would ensure that the path exists in the derivation, but
>> also look up through the outputs to find one containing that file.
>
> Unfortunately, during evaluation you can't access the results of builds
e = "nk-parser";
buildDepends = args.buildDepends ++ [nk];
isExecutable = true;
});
Both of these might be easier to maintain than the workaround you've
come up with, although yours is of course perfectly valid too.
Cheers,
Harald van Dijk
__
for the same reason, but at least it is a list of very
stable software that's widely available in pretty much all package
repositories. Rust is not yet in the same category, as far as I know.
Cheers,
Harald van Dijk
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
ance if "." must always be followed by a digit, if a leading "+" is
also allowed, if exponential notation ("1E10") is supposed to be
allowed, if some spaces should be allowed, etc., it can be tweaked
fairly easily.
Cheers,
Harald van Dijk
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
e sure to use tags and not some
custom ref naming scheme, nothing special needs to be done.
Cheers,
Harald van Dijk
> But anyway, IMO it will take some time before it gets noticeable. I
> often check out all the pull request branches, so I have thousands refs
> already, without noticing any
wn
configuration the same way.
If using Nix without NixOS, then something similar should be easy to do
manually.
Cheers,
Harald van Dijk
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
t you should be able to use instead.
Cheers,
Harald van Dijk
On 03/01/2015 04:21 PM, Anderson Torres wrote:
> Hello, Nixers!
>
> How can I "fetchurl" a variable url?
>
> When I download a dockapp from Windowmaker site, like
>
> "http://windowmaker.org/dockapps/?
ftware is freely downloadable --
although admittedly doing so through the website does require the user
to indicate acceptance of the EULA. According to Adobe, even mere use of
the software requires acceptance of the EULA. Because of this, the
package is installab
worth it. One thing worth pointing
out is that it makes (or at least seems to make) nix-collect-garbage
need more time to complete.
Cheers,
Harald van Dijk
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
On 09/02/2015 15:57, James Haigh wrote:
On 09/02/15 14:16, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On 09/02/2015 14:55, James Haigh wrote:
On 28/01/15 07:42, Luke Clifton wrote:
Hi Bjørn,
I have read that thread. I agree with you 100% that native builds
(on real or virtual hardware) is the only way this can
piling.
Still, many packages build such tools with the host compiler anyway,
because upstream only tests native compilations. This too is not an
issue with the toolchain.
Cheers,
Harald van Dijk
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
On 09/12/2014 21:04, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014, at 06:24 AM, Harald van Dijk wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've recently been trying to use Nix in a somewhat different way than
>> NixOS, and the builders I've got, it would be useful if they were abl
lco Dolstra
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On 04/12/14 12:24, Harald van Dijk wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there any interest in getting something like this in Nix? I would be
>>> perfectly happy to clean this patch up, get it into better shape, bu
any interest in getting something like this in Nix? I would be
perfectly happy to clean this patch up, get it into better shape, but
I'd like to avoid doing so if (for whatever reason) it is decided that
Nix should not be using this.
Cheers,
Harald van Dijk
--- a/src/libstore/build.c
16 matches
Mail list logo
