On 11/6/11 2:18 AM, Shea Levy wrote:
> Author: shlevy
> Date: Sun Nov 6 07:18:19 2011
> New Revision: 30258
> URL: https://nixos.org/websvn/nix/?rev=30258&sc=1
Hi all (especially Eelco),
With this commit, I believe the multiple-outputs-sandbox branch is ready
for consideration to be merged into
Hi Shea,
I guess the context is used to be able to build multiple outputs out
of one derivation file, am I correct ?
What can be achieved with multiple outputs ? having variants such as
headers, libraries, manpage ? Or multiple versions ? Can we change
the sources/build procedure and the depen
Hi Nicholas,
On 11/6/11 4:01 PM, Nicolas Pierron wrote:
> Hi Shea,
>
> I guess the context is used to be able to build multiple outputs out
> of one derivation file, am I correct ?
Yes. The idea is actually described in Eelco's thesis, but it's only
recently that he put into place the infrastruc
Shea Levy wrote:
> On 11/6/11 2:18 AM, Shea Levy wrote:
>> Author: shlevy
>> Date: Sun Nov 6 07:18:19 2011
>> New Revision: 30258
>> URL: https://nixos.org/websvn/nix/?rev=30258&sc=1
>
> Hi all (especially Eelco),
>
> With this commit, I believe the multiple-outputs-sandbox branch is ready
> fo
Hi,
the idea sounds great.
On 7 November 2011 19:56, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
> 2. About cyclic dependencies. An output should have a way to tell nix to
> ignore some dependencies. Say, $out/nix-support/ignored-dependencies. Use
> case: splitting debug information from the main package (main pa
Hi Eelco,
On 11/6/11 2:26 AM, Shea Levy wrote:
> On 11/6/11 2:18 AM, Shea Levy wrote:
>> Author: shlevy
>> Date: Sun Nov 6 07:18:19 2011
>> New Revision: 30258
>> URL: https://nixos.org/websvn/nix/?rev=30258&sc=1
>
> Hi all (especially Eelco),
>
> With this commit, I believe the multiple-outputs-
Hi Eelco,
On 11/20/11 10:04 AM, Shea Levy wrote:
> Hi Eelco,
>
> On 11/6/11 2:26 AM, Shea Levy wrote:
>> On 11/6/11 2:18 AM, Shea Levy wrote:
>>> Author: shlevy
>>> Date: Sun Nov 6 07:18:19 2011
>>> New Revision: 30258
>>> URL: https://nixos.org/websvn/nix/?rev=30258&sc=1
>>
>> Hi all (especially
On 11/26/2011 01:17 PM, Shea Levy wrote:
> Should I consider the lack of response as a rejection of the merge request?
Nope, haven't had time to look at it yet :-( Hopefully this week.
--
Eelco Dolstra | http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~dolstra/
___
nix
