On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Michael Raskin <7c6f4...@mail.ru> wrote:
> This is called "breaking many use cases for email". This means I cannot
> write email on a blackboard in the beginning of a talk.
Not so, I issue an Interest packet which floods into the network and
finds you. The Interest
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Michael Raskin <7c6f4...@mail.ru> wrote:
>>* you can't make a viable security model - secure pipes vs secure
>>data. (spam still gets through, network is blind to the data)
>
> You cannot solve spam problem just by switching protocols without
> breaking a ton of com
The main problems NDN solves are:
TCP is inherently a conversational point-to-point network. We now do
content dissemination over a point-to-point network as a side effect.
It doesn't work well in 3 ways:
* you can't make a viable security model - secure pipes vs secure
data. (spam still gets thr
No, NDN is so much more than solving the problem of self-signed certificates.
This talk sums it up nicely: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCZMoY3q2uM
All hail Van Jacobson!
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Michael Raskin <7c6f4...@mail.ru> wrote:
> The way I understand it, NDN is designed to bre
Yes indeed NDN will change, as does everything :-)
I love the idea of adding NDN as a retrieval method.
The way I understand it, NDN has a concept of a face, which is
designed to talks over different protocols.
In other words NDN /becomes/ your multiprotocol non-centralized thingy-ma-gig.
Anothe
(blast it, some key shortcut sent the previous email before I was ready)
100% Reproducible Hydra builds
NixOS already has a very impressive track record in delivering quality
reproducible services via AWS and other cloud platforms. The secret
sauce is NixOps, Nix and most importantly Hydra. Hydra
100% Reproducible Hydra builds
NixOS already has a very impressive track record in delivering quality
reproducible services via AWS and other cloud platforms. The secret
sauce is NixOps, Nix and most importantly Hydra. Hydra is the heart
and liver that keeps the packages cleanly building and circu
I prefer the NDN approach for a number of reasons:
* An Alan Kay quote: The Internet was done so well that most people
think of it as a natural resource like the Pacific Ocean, rather than
something that was man-made. When was the last time a technology with
a scale like that was so error-free? Th
Possibly so, though maybe limiting the scope of this GSoC project to
reproducible builds is a suitable approach? Thus laying the foundation for
whatever dissemination strategy to be adopted in future.
> On 5 Feb 2015 14:18, "Michael Raskin" <7c6f4...@mail.ru> wrote:
>
> As for web of trust and NDN
It seems like distributed binary trust would be greatly facilitated by
an intensional store. Anyone interested in reviving that?
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:34 PM, stewart mackenzie wrote:
> Distributed Hydra build support
>
> NixOS already has a very impressive track record in delivering quality
>
Distributed Hydra build support
NixOS already has a very impressive track record in delivering quality
reproducible services via AWS and other cloud platforms. The secret
sauce is NixOps, Nix and most importantly Hydra. Hydra is the heart
and liver that keeps the packages cleanly building and circ
2015-02-04 10:37 GMT-02:00 Domen Kožar :
> Hi all,
>
> Google Summer of Code 2015 opens registrations on 9th of February for
> organizations and closes on 20th of February. We have 5 days to write down
> ideas how could a student improve NixOS during his/her summer.
>
> We've applied last year but
Hi all,
Google Summer of Code 2015 opens registrations on 9th of February for
organizations and closes on 20th of February. We have 5 days to write down
ideas how could a student improve NixOS during his/her summer.
We've applied last year but didn't get accepted. Let's do our best to give
it ano
13 matches
Mail list logo
