I think a lot of packages rely on bashism, it's not only a matter of our
scripts. Changing to something else will bring more problems than anything
else. Also the fact that bash sees more security vulnerabilities it's
because it's extremely more adopted than others, which doesn't mean others
are mo
>If we're replacing bash we might as well go all the way...
>
>Have we made any progress rewriting systemd in csh?
All the ways is at least Guile-as-a-shell, anf I guess we should just
admit that Guix with its dmd is the proper way forward?
I must admit that I don't like your defeatist attitude o