On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Sander van der Burg - EWI
s.vanderb...@tudelft.nl wrote:
I have decided to update my blog post with some additional notes based on
the discussion:
Ugh. I fell for it. I even wondered if it could be a joke and then decided
No way! Look at all this code.
...@lists.science.uu.nl]
on behalf of Colin Putney [co...@wiresong.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 6:55 PM
To: nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
Subject: Re: [Nix-dev] NiJS package manager
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Sander van der Burg - EWI
s.vanderb...@tudelft.nlmailto:s.vanderb
On 04/02/2014 08:38 PM, Sander van der Burg - EWI wrote:
Well, the package is not a joke. It's actually capable of doing all the
things that I described.
However, for me it's just a toy project/playground of mostly
silly/useless experiments that I collected the the 1.5 years. A few use
cases
On 04/02/2014 08:43 PM, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
It really seemed strange to me from the start, even not considering the
date... but then I believed your intentions when I remembered Guix,
which was a very similar project from my point of view (only the creator
has a different favorite language
-dev] NiJS package manager
On 04/02/2014 08:43 PM, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
It really seemed strange to me from the start, even not considering the
date... but then I believed your intentions when I remembered Guix,
which was a very similar project from my point of view (only the creator
has
Hello Nixers,
After a year of hard work, I proudly want to present you NiJS: the asynchronous
package manager.
In NiJS, you can use the more popular, innovating and future proof JavaScript
language to specify package build specifications while still having most of the
useful goodies that Nix
http://sandervanderburg.blogspot.com/2014/04/asynchronous-package-management-with.html
I have discovered that the Nix expression language is complicated and
difficult to learn. Like Haskell, it has a solid theoretical foundation
and powerful features (such as laziness), but it's too hard to
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 10:52:10AM +, Marc Weber wrote:
Thus eventually its time to think about which information could be
shared. Who would join a software version documentation project
allowing people to upload the most recent version of my software is X,
and it requires Z, FOO, BAR ?
http://sandervanderburg.blogspot.com/2014/04/asynchronous-package-management-with.html
I have discovered that the Nix expression language is complicated and
difficult to learn. Like Haskell, it has a solid theoretical foundation
and powerful features (such as laziness), but it's too hard to
Hi Sander!
Sander van der Burg - EWI s.vanderb...@tudelft.nl skribis:
After a year of hard work, I proudly want to present you NiJS: the
asynchronous package manager.
In NiJS, you can use the more popular, innovating and future proof
JavaScript language to specify package build
I would certainly be keen to see a switch from a central nixpkgs repo to a
system whereby the nix expression comes with the package itself. Yes,
lots of details to figure out there, but I think it's preferable for a
number of reasons. Then, obviously, there are central servers where this
data
Hi,
On 01/04/14 12:11, Sander van der Burg - EWI wrote:
After a year of hard work, I proudly want to present you NiJS: the
asynchronous
package manager.
In NiJS, you can use the more popular, innovating and future proof JavaScript
language to specify package build specifications while
...@lists.science.uu.nl]
on behalf of Ludovic Courtès [l...@gnu.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 1:58 PM
To: nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
Subject: Re: [Nix-dev] NiJS package manager
Hi Sander!
Sander van der Burg - EWI s.vanderb...@tudelft.nl skribis:
After a year of hard work, I proudly want
I think this is the wrong way to go. The bootstrap size for JavaScript is
huge with nodejs depending on the world. Nix is relatively small which is
nice. It's far from optimal though.
Haskell is also huge, but there are a few languages with tiny footprints. I
suggest we look at ash or maybe zsh.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Shell Turner cam.t...@gmail.com wrote:
http://sandervanderburg.blogspot.com/2014/04/asynchronous-package-management-with.html
I have discovered that the Nix expression language is complicated and
difficult to learn. Like Haskell, it has a solid theoretical
Excerpts from Matthew Sackman's message of Tue Apr 01 11:12:32 + 2014:
I'm guessing that the mechanical let's attempt to translate
$language-specific-deps-file into nix has been tried and found wanting?
I can see there's the node-packages-generated.nix, and others, but is
that approach
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 04:42:50PM +, Marc Weber wrote:
We should not be against a new option, we should think harder about
collaborating so that all targets will work - which one is the best fit
for use cases - future might tell.
Indeed. One of the things that seems (at least to me) wrong
Please think the other way round:
- most linux distributions (exceptions LFS I know about) want to install
packages
Some packages (such as gnome) have dependency information, but only
encoded in configure scripts or READMEs.
Rubyforge and PyPi (don't know what's current in python
Hi! Interesting project, but I mostly agree with Colin: asynchronous
programming is hard and in my opinion wouldn't become a 'killer
feature'. More, I am sure there are concepts in functional languages
which will overcome the callback-passing approach of JavaScript. I
think, Haskell's continuation
OK, april 1st?
2014-04-01 23:11 GMT+04:00 Sergey Mironov grr...@gmail.com:
Hi! Interesting project, but I mostly agree with Colin: asynchronous
programming is hard and in my opinion wouldn't become a 'killer
feature'. More, I am sure there are concepts in functional languages
which will
Guys,
Wasn't this replace Nix with JavaScript in a community of folks who
love purity, lazyness and high-level languages post an April's fools?
Check the date!
Or am I mistaken and is this a serious proposal?
Confused,
Gergely
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 10:43:15 -0500, Colin Putney co...@wiresong.com
From: nix-dev-boun...@lists.science.uu.nl [nix-dev-boun...@lists.science.uu.nl]
on behalf of Gergely Risko [gerg...@risko.hu]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 9:19 PM
To: nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
Subject: Re: [Nix-dev] NiJS package manager
Guys,
Wasn't this replace
22 matches
Mail list logo
