I'm using haskellngPackages now on nixos unstable and it doesn't seem to
have all versions of all dependencies... I thought that was part of the
problem it was solving?
Maybe that makes me sound greedy, but would it be possible and/or plausible
to do this? If not what are the issues being faced?
Hi Cody,
> haskellngPackages doesn't seem to have all versions of all dependencies...
I'm not sure what you mean by "all versions of all dependencies". Dependencies
of what exactly? The way I understand the term, "dependency" has meaning only
as a relationship between two packages, i.e. "transfo
On 02/22/2015 12:04 PM, Peter Simons wrote:
> Hi Cody,
>
> > haskellngPackages doesn't seem to have all versions of all dependencies...
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "all versions of all dependencies". Dependencies
> of what exactly? The way I understand the term, "dependency" has meaning on
> A related question: is there a way to generate a package list containing
> exactly the versions of dependencies we require?
I asked a similar question but about the cabal.config file some time
ago. Here's the response:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.nixos/15885
I haven't t
This almost certainly isn't ready for release, but I'd like to avoid
duplicating efforts if other people want to work on it...
Here is cabbage https://github.com/acowley/cabbage
It is a tool for doing the obvious thing: use the cabal solver to find
a build plan, then build the specific version of
On 02/25/2015 03:01 AM, Anthony Cowley wrote:
> This almost certainly isn't ready for release, but I'd like to avoid
> duplicating efforts if other people want to work on it...
>
> Here is cabbage https://github.com/acowley/cabbage
>
> It is a tool for doing the obvious thing: use the cabal solve
Using cabbage you only need to do 'cabbage; nix shell'. iirc, the sandboxes
were transparent.
On Feb 24, 2015 11:57 PM, "Mateusz Kowalczyk"
wrote:
> On 02/25/2015 03:01 AM, Anthony Cowley wrote:
> > This almost certainly isn't ready for release, but I'd like to avoid
> > duplicating efforts if ot
Hi Mateusz,
> A related question: is there a way to generate a package list containing
> exactly the versions of dependencies we require?
>
> Say we have a package with cabal file
>
> A == 1.0
> B > 2.0
> C < 0.5
>
> but the latest Hackage has versions lower and higher &c and that's what
On 2015-02-24 at 23:24, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
>> A related question: is there a way to generate a package list containing
>> exactly the versions of dependencies we require?
>
> I asked a similar question but about the cabal.config file some time
> ago. Here's the response:
>
> http://article.
This almost certainly isn't ready for release, but I'd like to avoid
duplicating efforts if other people want to work on it...
Here is cabbage https://github.com/acowley/cabbage
It is a tool for doing the obvious thing: use the cabal solver to find
a build plan, then build the specific version of
> On Feb 25, 2015, at 3:12 AM, Cody Goodman
> wrote:
>
> Using cabbage you only need to do 'cabbage; nix shell'. iirc, the sandboxes
> were transparent.
>
This is correct. Linking into the local sandbox is a separate, optional step. I
wanted this as it let me continue using my old pre-nix
11 matches
Mail list logo
