Re: [Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-20 Thread zimbatm
I was looking for a way to visualize the number of open issues over time and found this: https://9-volt.github.io/bug-life/?repo=nixos/nixpkgs .Unfortunately we have too much content and it's hitting the API rate/limit. The idea was to see the current trend. Maybe after 2-3 weeks of codetriage the

Re: [Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-20 Thread Michael Raskin
>>> https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?utf8=✓&q=is:pr+is:open+updated:<2015-10-01 >> >> My point was ?if the submitter has got commit rights by now?. >> >> That seems to be harder to query for. > >Yeah, there seems to be no way. I can only see filtering by mentions of >the whole nixos/nixpkgs

Re: [Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-20 Thread Vladimír Čunát
On 02/20/2016 12:31 PM, Michael Raskin wrote: >> https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?utf8=✓&q=is:pr+is:open+updated:<2015-10-01 > > My point was ?if the submitter has got commit rights by now?. > > That seems to be harder to query for. Yeah, there seems to be no way. I can only see filtering

Re: [Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-20 Thread Michael Raskin
>https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?utf8=✓&q=is:pr+is:open+updated:<2015-10-01 My point was ?if the submitter has got commit rights by now?. That seems to be harder to query for. ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.s

Re: [Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-20 Thread Vladimír Čunát
On 02/20/2016 10:45 AM, Wout Mertens wrote: > Now if we could run a query for that… :-) GitHub can run similar queries easily: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?utf8=✓&q=is:pr+is:open+updated:<2015-10-01 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___

Re: [Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-20 Thread Wout Mertens
Now if we could run a query for that… :-) On Sat, Feb 20, 2016, 10:26 AM Michael Raskin <7c6f4...@mail.ru> wrote: > >Same for PRs, we have some really old ones. What is a good cutoff? 6 > months? > > I would start with «6 months without any updates except non-submitter > pings and the submitter n

Re: [Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-19 Thread Wout Mertens
Same for PRs, we have some really old ones. What is a good cutoff? 6 months? On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, 7:50 PM Profpatsch wrote: > On 16-02-17 08:18pm, Rok Garbas wrote: > > I would suggest closing tickets that you think are not crucial or > > reporter does not provide code that we can include. Ofco

Re: [Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-18 Thread Profpatsch
On 16-02-17 08:18pm, Rok Garbas wrote: > I would suggest closing tickets that you think are not crucial or > reporter does not provide code that we can include. Ofcourse be nice > in comment and ask reported to reopen if they think you are wrong to > do this. > > What you say, could this work and

Re: [Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-17 Thread Rok Garbas
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Vladimír Čunát wrote: > On 02/17/2016 07:49 PM, William Casarin wrote: >> How would I go about triaging this? I went and made sure it hasn't >> been done yet, and then move on I guess... > > I added a label, but I don't see what else to do, except for packaging > i

Re: [Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-17 Thread Vladimír Čunát
On 02/17/2016 07:49 PM, William Casarin wrote: > How would I go about triaging this? I went and made sure it hasn't > been done yet, and then move on I guess... I added a label, but I don't see what else to do, except for packaging it, but my personal priorities are elsewhere... There are quite a

Re: [Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-17 Thread William Casarin
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Vladimír Čunát wrote: > Interesting. I'm rather doubtful about this approach for this kind of > project, but maybe it will work out well. > > --Vladimir Yeah, I got this issue: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/11647 How would I go about triaging this? I w

Re: [Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-17 Thread Vladimír Čunát
Interesting. I'm rather doubtful about this approach for this kind of project, but maybe it will work out well. --Vladimir smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science

Re: [Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-16 Thread Rok Garbas
i've signed up as well. looks interesting to load balance the issue delegation work automatically. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Jakob Gillich wrote: > Interesting, that looks like a good way to reduce the amount of open > issues. I've signed up. > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 11:43 PM, Profpat

Re: [Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-16 Thread Jakob Gillich
Interesting, that looks like a good way to reduce the amount of open issues. I've signed up. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 11:43 PM, Profpatsch wrote: > I just created a Repo page for nixpkgs at codetriage.com. > > It is a simple site that sends you 1 open issue each day once > you sign up with your G

[Nix-dev] codetriage.com

2016-02-16 Thread Profpatsch
I just created a Repo page for nixpkgs at codetriage.com. It is a simple site that sends you 1 open issue each day once you sign up with your Github account. Maybe a few people want to join me. -- Proudly written in Mutt with Vim on NixOS. Q: Why is this email five sentences or less? A: http://