Re: [Nix-dev] python-x.y.z-wrapper vs python-x.y.z-full

2011-10-15 Thread Peter Simons
Hi Florian, the attribute name for pythonXYFull is python-X.Y.Z-wrapper. I'd consider python-X.Y.Z-full to be more intuitive. Anything against renaming? use of the suffix -wrapper is very common in Nix. GCC follows the same naming scheme, and so does GHC. I don't see what we would gain

Re: [Nix-dev] python-x.y.z-wrapper vs python-x.y.z-full

2011-10-15 Thread Florian Friesdorf
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:54:40 +0200, Peter Simons sim...@cryp.to wrote: Hi Florian, the attribute name for pythonXYFull is python-X.Y.Z-wrapper. I'd consider python-X.Y.Z-full to be more intuitive. Anything against renaming? use of the suffix -wrapper is very common in Nix. GCC

[Nix-dev] python-x.y.z-wrapper vs python-x.y.z-full

2011-10-14 Thread Florian Friesdorf
Hi, the attribute name for pythonXYFull is python-X.Y.Z-wrapper. I'd consider python-X.Y.Z-full to be more intuitive. Anything against renaming? regards -- Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net GPG FPR: 7A13 5EEE 1421 9FC2 108D BAAF 38F8 99A3 0C45 F083 Jabber/XMPP: f...@chaoflow.net IRC: