Re: [Nix-dev] stdenv updates for non-nixos

2012-04-11 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
jack-...@mudshark.org wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 04:54:31PM +0200, Eelco Dolstra wrote: > >> The better solution is to prevent Glibc from looking in /etc/ld.so.cache. >> This is an unintended side-effect of r30069: > >> * Build Glibc with sysconfdir set to /etc. This causes it to look f

Re: [Nix-dev] stdenv updates for non-nixos

2012-04-10 Thread jack-nix
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 04:54:31PM +0200, Eelco Dolstra wrote: > The better solution is to prevent Glibc from looking in /etc/ld.so.cache. > This > is an unintended side-effect of r30069: > * Build Glibc with sysconfdir set to /etc. This causes it to look for > ?localtime? (the default time

Re: [Nix-dev] stdenv updates for non-nixos

2012-04-10 Thread Eelco Dolstra
Hi, On 09/04/12 23:18, jack-...@mudshark.org wrote: > Here's an updated version of my glibc rpath patch that solves a few more cases > with libnss_* and friends. The better solution is to prevent Glibc from looking in /etc/ld.so.cache. This is an unintended side-effect of r30069: * Build Glib

[Nix-dev] stdenv updates for non-nixos

2012-04-09 Thread jack-nix
Here's an updated version of my glibc rpath patch that solves a few more cases with libnss_* and friends. I wanted a better solution, but this seems to have covered off the problematic cases of nix applications picking up system libraries. --Jack -- Jack (John) Cummings