Hi Again,
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 21:38, Nicolas Pierron
nicolas.b.pier...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Shea,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:01, Shea Levy s...@shealevy.com wrote:
Based on my understanding of Nix semantics, I expected the following to
all evaluate to 2:
let
a = { c = 1; d = b.c; };
On 03/25/2012 12:38 AM, Nicolas Pierron wrote:
rec {
a = withATTRNAMES;LAZY { c = 1; d =LAZY c; };
b =LAZY a //LAZY { c = 2; };
}
in b.d
oul
ATTRNAMES implies that we need to be able to iterate over the with
clause attribute set to bind names such as c.
Even accepting that for
On 03/25/2012 06:44 PM, Nicolas Pierron wrote:
sed -i 's/callPackage/with pkgs; callPackage/' all-packages.nix
Eh, at that point I'd rather just go and prefix everything with pkgs.
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 20:18, Shea Levy s...@shealevy.com wrote:
On 03/25/2012 12:38 AM, Nicolas Pierron wrote:
rec {
a = withATTRNAMES;LAZY { c = 1; d =LAZY c; };
b =LAZY a //LAZY { c = 2; };
}
in b.d
oul
ATTRNAMES implies that we need to be able to iterate over the with
Hi Shea,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:01, Shea Levy s...@shealevy.com wrote:
Based on my understanding of Nix semantics, I expected the following to
all evaluate to 2:
let
a = { c = 1; d = b.c; };
b = a // { c = 2; };
in b.d
a let is like arec { … }
rec {
a = LAZY { c = 1; d =
Hello,
Based on my understanding of Nix semantics, I expected the following to
all evaluate to 2:
let
a = { c = 1; d = b.c; };
b = a // { c = 2; };
in b.d
let
a = with b; { c = 1; d = c; };
b = a // { c = 2; };
in b.d
with (throw an error); 2
with ({a = 2;}); with (throw an
