Re: [Nix-dev] glib-2.30 again

2012-03-16 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Rob Vermaas wrote: > Jobset has been added: > http://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixpkgs/glib-230 Thanks! BTW, hydra says that it is disabled. About hydra cycles: we can start with x86_64 (and i686?) only. I can't fix anything else anyway. -- Yury G. Kudryashov, mailto: ur...@mccme.ru

Re: [Nix-dev] glib-2.30 again

2012-03-16 Thread Rob Vermaas
Jobset has been added: http://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixpkgs/glib-230 Cheers, Rob > Yes it is possible, and I might have time later today to add it. > > The 'policy' is as follows: >  - hydra.nixos.org and specifically running a nixpkgs branch in hydra > is a privilege, not a right >  - hydra.nix

Re: [Nix-dev] glib-2.30 again

2012-03-15 Thread Rob Vermaas
Hi, > I've asked to add glib-2.30-take2 branch to hydra 3 times. When I asked on > IRC, Rob asked me if I've already defined a small subset of packages to > build. First, I never been told to do it. Me mentioning that was me telling you. > Second, it makes no sense to build only a few packages o

Re: [Nix-dev] glib-2.30 again

2012-03-15 Thread Michael Raskin
>Michael Raskin wrote: > >>>Second, it makes no sense to build only a few packages on glib upgrade. >>>Every package that depends on glib may fail. A few packages that do not >>>depend on glib will add no overhead to hydra since their builds will be >>>cached from the trunk jobset. >> >> Well, it

Re: [Nix-dev] glib-2.30 again

2012-03-15 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Michael Raskin wrote: >>Second, it makes no sense to build only a few packages on glib upgrade. >>Every package that depends on glib may fail. A few packages that do not >>depend on glib will add no overhead to hydra since their builds will be >>cached from the trunk jobset. > > Well, it does mak