I would recommend you first go online and look up the National Do Not Call
Registry (and I think there are state-wide registries, too) and put her
number on those. That has made a HUGE difference when I have done that for
some family members in the past. As I recall, you have to re-submit every
y
xor wrote:
> I need a call block device for a POTS line. The call block service
> from AT&T costs $6 a month, and it won't block all numbers. Likewise,
> anonymous call rejection won't block all of them either. I need to be
> able to have it block things like 062 area codes, phone numbers like
I need a call block device for a POTS line. The call block service
from AT&T costs $6 a month, and it won't block all numbers. Likewise,
anonymous call rejection won't block all of them either. I need to be
able to have it block things like 062 area codes, phone numbers like
000-000-, phone
I posted a while ago to the list on this issue. Not being adept at
LDAP, I'm looking for someone who is!
We have a printing control system running on Linux that uses LDAP for
account updates and for authentication. The print system can only be
configured to point to a single LDAP server, but fo
- "Andrew Farnsworth" wrote:
> And I guess you could run vserver inside a VMWare session which would
> let
> you migrate everything enmass to new hardware.
You could. Under VMWare server, you are limited to guests only getting
2 CPUs. This would limit how much you could consolidate under vs
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Howard White wrote:
>
> Don Delp wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:02 PM, hpladds wrote:
>
> >> http://atlaug.com/drupal/fest2009
> > Anybody else interested in car pooling? I'm about 80% interested in
> > going and 20% interested in driving.
>
> The logist
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Alex Smith (K4RNT) wrote:
>
> Sounds like what Solaris has been doing for a couple years now as
> Solaris Containers/Zones. :)
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Steven S. Critchfield
> wrote:
> >
> > - "Andrew Farnsworth" wrote:
> >> I am presuming that
Sounds like what Solaris has been doing for a couple years now as
Solaris Containers/Zones. :)
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Steven S. Critchfield
wrote:
>
> - "Andrew Farnsworth" wrote:
>> I am presuming that using vserver you don't have the ability to
>> migrate a
>> running machine /
- "Andrew Farnsworth" wrote:
> I am presuming that using vserver you don't have the ability to
> migrate a
> running machine / instance to different hardware?
As in the vmware vmotion? No, you can't migrate them to other harware
with the vserver tools. The trouble is that vserver works by
s
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Steven S. Critchfield
wrote:
>
> Just as a example of the reduced overhead for using vserver...
>
> I just converted our backup server from vmware to vserver. Under
> vmware, 46 processes as reported by top are running just after boot
> up. I think it normally ran
Just as a example of the reduced overhead for using vserver...
I just converted our backup server from vmware to vserver. Under
vmware, 46 processes as reported by top are running just after boot
up. I think it normally ran at 51, but I had to disable the network
on it to not conflict with the vs
Don Delp wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:02 PM, hpladds wrote:
>> http://atlaug.com/drupal/fest2009
>>
>
> You had me at "lunch" :)
>
> Anybody else interested in car pooling? I'm about 80% interested in
> going and 20% interested in driving.
The logistics are a little difficult, Don.
12 matches
Mail list logo
