Re: [nlug] Presentation volunteers for Linux Fest needed

2010-06-11 Thread JMJ
On 6/10/2010 4:55 PM, Chris McQuistion wrote: So can I put on the website that we will have a presentation called "Linux 101: Getting Started with Linux" at 2 PM, by Joey and Andrew? OK... got the work-related rumors figured out. I'll be available on the 26th, so count me in... assuming that

Re: [nlug] SCO v IBM now functionally over

2010-06-11 Thread Michael Chaney
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Russ Crawford wrote: > What are the measurable results, not moral or philosophical, this decision > has for the Linux community? At this point - none. It cost the commercial Linux community some money years back, but it ceased to be relevant about a year after t

Re: [nlug] SCO v IBM now functionally over

2010-06-11 Thread David R Wilson
Hello Russ, I don't think there is anything terribly earth shattering about this result. It is a terrible shame this much time and a bucket full of money was wasted on lifting the cloud of FUD from Linux. There was no proof of any ownership or infringement of intellectual property that SCO could

Re: [nlug] SCO v IBM now functionally over

2010-06-11 Thread Russ Crawford
andrew mcelroy wrote: From Groklaw: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100610161411160 About Time (TM) What are the measurable results, not moral or philosophical, this decision has for the Linux community? -- Russ Crawford 615/506-4070 -- You received this message because you a

Re: [nlug] Virtualization with LXC (Linux Containers) vs Linux Vserver

2010-06-11 Thread Bucky 'Igneous' Wolfe
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Dave Manginelli wrote: > I mentioned at the meeting that I'm just getting started with LXC > virtualization--which is the officially blessed future of Linux > Vserver/"chroot on steroids" type of virtualization.  (The extensions > required for LXC are now part of t

Re: [nlug] Virtualization with LXC (Linux Containers) vs Linux Vserver

2010-06-11 Thread gk
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:38:15 -0500, Dave Manginelli wrote: I mentioned at the meeting that I'm just getting started with LXC virtualization--which is the officially blessed future of Linux Vserver/"chroot on steroids" type of virtualization. (The extensions required for LXC are now part of t

[nlug] SCO v IBM now functionally over

2010-06-11 Thread andrew mcelroy
>From Groklaw: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100610161411160 About Time (TM) Andrew McElroy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, s

Re: [nlug] Big Clock

2010-06-11 Thread Bill Woody
Enzyte. On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:47 AM, j...@coats.org wrote: > I thought I saw a 'big LED clock' on ThinkGeek or somewhere but I > can't find the link now. > > It has something like 12" tall digits. Does anyone know where to find it? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscri

[nlug] Big Clock

2010-06-11 Thread j...@coats.org
I thought I saw a 'big LED clock' on ThinkGeek or somewhere but I can't find the link now. It has something like 12" tall digits. Does anyone know where to find it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To post to this group, send email to n

[nlug] Virtualization with LXC (Linux Containers) vs Linux Vserver

2010-06-11 Thread Dave Manginelli
I mentioned at the meeting that I'm just getting started with LXC virtualization--which is the officially blessed future of Linux Vserver/"chroot on steroids" type of virtualization. (The extensions required for LXC are now part of the mainline kernel, including the stock Ubuntu 10.04 kernel.) I

Re: [nlug] Presentation volunteers for Linux Fest needed

2010-06-11 Thread JMJ
On 6/10/2010 4:55 PM, Chris McQuistion wrote: So can I put on the website that we will have a presentation called "Linux 101: Getting Started with Linux" at 2 PM, by Joey and Andrew? I'm hearing rumors that the 3 shows I'm currently booked to work might end up being more than that, so let me c