[nlug] Dependecy Hell

2011-06-07 Thread Richard Thomas
Why does it seem with Perl that the likelihood of entering dependency hell is inversely proportional to the length of the script you want to write? I have a 10 liner which requires one simple module. Which requires 3 or 4 modules from cpan. Which themselves require another dozen modules

Re: [nlug] Dependecy Hell

2011-06-07 Thread David R. Wilson
Google for MCPAN and see if that fixes things, or breaks them even further. Most of the time it will install dependencies without much of a problem. YMMV, I only abuse Perl when I can. Dave On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 01:03 -0500, Richard Thomas wrote: Why does it seem with Perl that the

Re: [nlug] Dependecy Hell

2011-06-07 Thread Richard Thomas
Funnily enough, it was a date module: DateTime::Format::Mail . I just wanted to be able to parse the Date: header in emails for sorting into different folders. After much messing about, I gave up when it wanted libgmp.so.10 . I do have libgmp but it's the wrong version apparently. So I just

Re: [nlug] Dependecy Hell

2011-06-07 Thread Curt Lundgren
Gee, and I thought it was only bad karma on my part that kept module after module from compiling correctly. I'm a Perl fan, no question - yet every time I have to install a module to get something done, I'm crossing my fingers and holding my breath. Curt On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Richard