> FreeBSD in itself is also not to be confused with OS X. Like GNU/Linux,
> FreeBSD is a Free & Open Source Software UNIX-family operating system,
> but there are quite a few differences. FreeBSD proper uses a
> microkernel (called Mach)
No, it doesn't.
> and uses a different init system, based
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 16:38 in alt.os.linux.debian, somebody
identifying as Aragorn, arag...@chatfactory.invalid wrote...
> Aragorn wrote:
>
>> As I see it, the best chances at implementing Wine itself on OS X
>> would be to have at least X.Org installed on it first.
>
> Admitted
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 22:49 in alt.os.linux.debian, somebody
identifying as John F Morse, j...@example.invalid wrote...
Lars Uffmann wrote:
> Aragorn wrote:
>> As I see it, the best chances at implementing Wine itself on OS X would
>> be to have at least X.Org installed on it first.
The following is a reprint of a couple of mails that were on
alt.os.linux.debian newsgroup yesterday and today. I will not reprint
all of the mailings, but the two replies that are interesting. Here is
the original mailing that started the discussion:
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 16:38 in a
