On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 19:38 -0600, Greg Donald wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Bill Woody woody39...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe we could let the government run the internet provisioning! It could
easily be added to Obamacare!
- Original Message -
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 19:38 -0600, Greg Donald wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Bill Woody woody39...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe we could let the government run the internet provisioning!
It could
easily be added to Obamacare!
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:39 -0600, Steven S. Critchfield wrote:
- Original Message -
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 19:38 -0600, Greg Donald wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Bill Woody woody39...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe we could let the government run the internet provisioning!
Part of the Patriot Act was up for extension yesterday (getting the
daily digest has it's drawbacks, I didn't get to post this sooner).
The bill required 290 votes in order to pass. It failed but only by a
very small margin.
Here is a list of the votes
I finally figured out you have to trust that others have written their
code in the most secure way they know, and haven't hidden anything
unexpected.
And the same should go for Russia's plutonium. They are protecting it as
securely as possible. No one is trying to do anything bad.
(sigh)
On Feb 8, 4:40 pm, Paul Boniol paul.bon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Will Drewry w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Chris McQuistion
cmcquist...@watkins.edu wrote:
While I agree with your assessment, you have to consider that a serious
cyber
