I haven't been following the threads but I run a 100+ sco servers
everyday. If you are trying to read a Veritas file system drive
formatted by sco from linux I think you might be out of luck. At least I
never managed it. Solaris uses the same file system and I tried it wi
I have some SCO UNIX install media somewhere. Probably OpenServer 5.0.5 if
you need it.
Gibson
On Tuesday, February 11, 2014, Bill Woody wrote:
> Have you contacted SCO about a replacement copy of the os? I'm sure ...
> but... ya' never know.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Paul Boniol
>
Have you contacted SCO about a replacement copy of the os? I'm sure ...
but... ya' never know.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Paul Boniol wrote:
> I've got tons of old CD's. I tended toward Red Hat, Mandrake, Mandriva,
> OpenSUSE type lines but periodically tried lots of others. Let me know
I've got tons of old CD's. I tended toward Red Hat, Mandrake, Mandriva,
OpenSUSE type lines but periodically tried lots of others. Let me know if
you are interested and I will look to see what all I've got.
If you are looking for something close to SCO though, you might want to
look towards BSD.
I'm trying not to make a Theo de Raadt hole joke...
-Blake
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Gibson Prichard wrote:
> Slackware 8 used 2.2.19, with 2.4.5 as an option.
> Red Hat 7.0 used kernel 2.2.16, so that would work, as well.
> If you're trying to revive the SCO drive, Slackware might be th
Slackware 8 used 2.2.19, with 2.4.5 as an option.
Red Hat 7.0 used kernel 2.2.16, so that would work, as well.
If you're trying to revive the SCO drive, Slackware might be the closest
to SCO in terms of UNIX-like compatibility.
Gibson
On 2/7/2014 12:47 PM, Howard White wrote:
So, let's just su
So, let's just suppose for tickles and giggles, I wanted to build a
server running a linux kernel v2.2 or less. Anybody got a suggestion as
to which distribution I might go trolling for - either on the web or in
the VCCH / NLUG installfest archives???
Howard
--
--
You received this message b
