Re: [nlug] Whooiee! Backblaze's disk drive reliability report is out

2016-02-18 Thread Jack Coats
Paul, You can go to the Backblaze.com site and read their blog. Backblaze seems to be a great low cost backup service. They use Linux in their servers, but there is not a Linux backup agent for them. ... Kind of a bummer. (I use Crashplan mainly because Backblaze doesn't do linux backups). The

Re: [nlug] Whooiee! Backblaze's disk drive reliability report is out

2016-02-18 Thread Paul Tabolinsky
I find it hard to believe that: 56,000 drives, all running at once that's a lot of HDD's for sure! tell us more. Paul Tabo On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Tilghman Lesher wrote: > I was thinking about my fileserver, running FreeNAS. In that case, > SMART status is preinstal

Re: [nlug] Whooiee! Backblaze's disk drive reliability report is out

2016-02-18 Thread Tilghman Lesher
I was thinking about my fileserver, running FreeNAS. In that case, SMART status is preinstalled and really easy to configure, in terms of sending alerts. If SMART status is a reliable measure of when a drive is about to fail, then it's foolish not to use that to get advance notice. Of course, if

Re: [nlug] Whooiee! Backblaze's disk drive reliability report is out

2016-02-18 Thread Chris McQuistion
This is a good feature IF you have software that is actively monitoring the SMART data of your drives, sending out alerts/emails AND someone is paying attention to those alerts/emails. I believe that most people are lazy and won't actually install software to monitor their drive health, so buying

Re: [nlug] Whooiee! Backblaze's disk drive reliability report is out

2016-02-18 Thread David R. Wilson
Hmmm... Sounds like me. Always dropping a few zeros. Dave On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 19:15 -0600, Curt Lundgren wrote: > Jack, I make that mistake all the time - '1 and 2G drives' - it's hard > to keep up. Really. > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Jack Coats wrote: > They have take

Re: [nlug] Whooiee! Backblaze's disk drive reliability report is out

2016-02-17 Thread Tilghman Lesher
A hugely relevant stat, one that I consider at least as helpful as the overall drive failure rate, is the observation that the Seagate drives are more reliable in predicting their failure via SMART status. This means we can use the prediction to know when to purchase new drives and migrate data, p

Re: [nlug] Whooiee! Backblaze's disk drive reliability report is out

2016-02-17 Thread Curt Lundgren
Jack, I make that mistake all the time - '1 and 2G drives' - it's hard to keep up. Really. On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Jack Coats wrote: > They have taken all the 1 and 2G drives out of service. Replacing them > with mainly 4G some 6G drives. > > Looks like Hitachi (or whatever it is call

Re: [nlug] Whooiee! Backblaze's disk drive reliability report is out

2016-02-17 Thread Jack Coats
They have taken all the 1 and 2G drives out of service. Replacing them with mainly 4G some 6G drives. Looks like Hitachi (or whatever it is called now) seem to have the reliability lead! On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Curt Lundgren wrote: > 56,000 drives, all running at once: > > https://www

[nlug] Whooiee! Backblaze's disk drive reliability report is out

2016-02-17 Thread Curt Lundgren
56,000 drives, all running at once: https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-q4-2015/ -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send