Anders Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Running exmh 2.1.2 and nmh 1.0.3 I tried to bcc a message to one of my
> accounts. It didn't turn out the way I expected it. Is this a known
> behaviour? I auto-gpg sign my messages and it didn't handle the mime
> stuff correctly (exmh or nmh's fualt?) _and_ it throws in a strange
> Comment: line in the gpg section exmh 2.1.1. Where does that come from?
Well, considering it says "Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 (devel)", I'd say
it's a good bet exmh put it there. Is there any way you can try your Bcc
operation with plain nmh and see if it has the same problem as with exmh in
the picture?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Harkless | To prevent SPAM contamination, please
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | do not post this private email address
SpeedGate Communications, Inc. | to the USENET or WWW. Thank you.
