I looked for this in the FAQ, and couldn't find it. I posted to comp.mail.mh,
but so far no responses that helped.
Summary: I no longer get Cc: lines.
More detailed:
It appears that it is impossible for me to get a Cc line in a reply. My
replcomps are:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Seebach)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Seebach)
%(lit)%(formataddr %<{reply-to}%?{from}%?{sender}%?{return-path}%>)\
%<(nonnull)%(void(width))%(putaddr To: )\n%>\
%(lit)%(formataddr{to})%(formataddr{cc})%(formataddr(me))\
%<(nonnull)%(void(width))%(putaddr cc: )\n%>\
%<{fcc}Fcc: %{fcc}\n%>\
%<{subject}Subject: Re: %{subject}\n%>\
%<{date}In-reply-to: Your message of "\
%<(nodate{date})%{date}%|%(pretty{date})%>."%<{message-id}
%{message-id}%>\n%>\
--------
and otherwise work. It gets cooler. Let's say I were to do something like
%(lit)%(formataddr{to})\
%<(nonnull)%(void(width))%(putaddr Orig-To: )\n%>\
in just after the reply-to.
Nothing happens. So, "formataddr{to}" is coming out null.
It gets weirder still. If I use these replcomps:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Seebach)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Seebach)
%(lit)%(formataddr{from})\
%<(nonnull)%(void(width))%(putaddr Orig-To: )\n%>\
%(lit)%(formataddr %<{reply-to}%?{from}%?{sender}%?{return-path}%>)\
%<(nonnull)%(void(width))%(putaddr To: )\n%>\
%(lit)%(formataddr{to})%(formataddr{cc})%(formataddr(me))\
%<(nonnull)%(void(width))%(putaddr cc: )\n%>\
%<{fcc}Fcc: %{fcc}\n%>\
%<{subject}Subject: Re: %{subject}\n%>\
%<{date}In-reply-to: Your message of "\
%<(nodate{date})%{date}%|%(pretty{date})%>."%<{message-id}
%{message-id}%>\n%>\
--------
I now get an Orig-To: header... but *NOT* a To: header! Somehow, the To:
header is getting eaten when I print my bogus Orig-To header.
I have tried about five different sets of replcomps that people have
recommended, and in no cases, ever, can I get it to print anything based
on {to} from the message I'm replying to.
-s
