Neil W Rickert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Nathan Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on May 21, 2004:
> forw -mime
>to attach the original message as an rfc822 attachment.
That does 90% of what I want, the only other bit is that occasionally
I edit (gasp!) the messages to highlight the relevan
On 21 May 2004 at 10:06, Nathan Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using forward (e.g. forw -format) means I have to clean up the message
> by hand and re-attach any attachments -- a lot of work.
I either use "forw -mime" (as Neil mentioned), or I put a #forw
directive in the message body (which
Nathan Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on May 21, 2004:
>Using forward (e.g. forw -format) means I have to clean up the message
>by hand and re-attach any attachments -- a lot of work. I could write
You can use
forw -mime
to attach the original message as an rfc822 attachment.
-NWR
I'm a long-time mh user (10+ years?) but possibly a fairly basic one
(i.e. I don't necessarily know all the options available in its many
features). I have found that the only way Windows users can easily
see my attachments is doing them this way:
#application/msword; name="whattheusersee
