Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour

2007-04-10 Thread Joel Reicher
| Perhaps you are making a point about the way nmh generates message-ids? | Should the algorithm be smarter than it is for us to change the | default with a clear conscience? No, that's not it, the algorithm is fine (look at my message-id header, you'll see nothing there different

Re: [Nmh-workers] Does anyone remember how blind aliases used to work?

2007-04-10 Thread Neil W Rickert
Joel Reicher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Apr 10, 2007: There is a sample line in the mh-alias man page which doesn't appear to be supported anymore: b-people: Blind List: bill, betty; I just tested with 1.0.4, and it is working fine. I'll test later at home (newer version). Doing ali -list

Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour

2007-04-10 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:04:11 +1000 From:Joel Reicher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Nevertheless, I don't agree that the nmh algorithm is fine. On the | contrary, I think most of what you've said constitutes an argument in | favour of

Re: [Nmh-workers] Does anyone remember how blind aliases used to work?

2007-04-10 Thread Joel Reicher
There is a sample line in the mh-alias man page which doesn't appear to be supported anymore: b-people: Blind List: bill, betty; Doing ali -list b-people gives Blind List: bill betty; That's what I get with 1.0.4 (I used a different aliases entry, but got the equivalent result).