Re: [Nmh-workers] external MTA (was: nmh @ gsoc?)

2010-01-29 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:04:15 +0100, markus schnalke said: Use a simple forwarding MTA (like nullmailer or ssmtp) instead. Still more complicated than the one-line change to one file it took to change the SMTP server in nmh. ;) For the user, shipping an own forwarder is not much different than

Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?

2010-01-29 Thread Earl Hood
On January 29, 2010 at 11:36, markus schnalke wrote: What exactly do you mean with ``users''? If you mean people that are no programmers, then I agree. If you mean us, then I don't. I consider non-programmers. If not, nmh will just be a nitch MUA, and probably over time, die a slow death.

[Nmh-workers] Google SoC, part deux

2010-01-29 Thread Ken Hornstein
So, I heard back from the NetBSD Board. In a nutshell: they turned me down. The reason they gave was that there are a limited number of slots available as part of the SoC, and if nmh got one of those slots assigned to NetBSD, that would take away from a SoC project that benefited NetBSD ... and

Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?

2010-01-29 Thread Ken Hornstein
If popularity is the goal, then my answer to this is a resolute NO. I guess I see a wide range of possibilities between popular and dead. MH has filled a niche outside the mass market of MUAs since its inception. What it does, it does well. What it doesn't, it doesn't well. That's not a bad