>I know that was written as kind of a rhetorical question, no-one would
>ever want to go back to editing Makefiles and config.h type files, would
>they, these days?
>
>But yes, that is exactly the right solution these days - the time for autoconf
>has passed (when Larry Wall wrote the config script
On Nov 6, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX) wrote:
> And speaking of obscure platforms, is Hesiod still being used in the
> wild? The API usage in nmh is trivial enough, but I don't have any way
> of testing it.
It's still used at MIT. I would guess that most other places thes
Yes, MIT still uses Hesiod.
I do have access to an Athena account if there
is no other platform available for testing.
___
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
And speaking of obscure platforms, is Hesiod still being used in the
wild? The API usage in nmh is trivial enough, but I don't have any way
of testing it.
___
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-
Robert mentions:
> However, I am not nearly as confident as some here that everything is
> possible simply by writing posix compatible code. I don't mean by
> that that posix code can't do what MH needs, but that I suspect that
> there are still real users on real systems that don't do everything
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:08:52 +0700, Robert Elz said:
> Date:Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:27:33 +
> From:Peter Maydell
> Message-ID:
>
> | [Aside: 'columns' is
> | usually the same as 'characters' except that some Chinese/Japanese
> | characters are two columns wide
