On 2012-02-17, at 11:21 AM, n...@dad.org wrote:
> Is there any way I could change it for a single message, short of modifying
> mts.conf -- maybe some kind of entry in .mh_profile or something? Note that
> messages for which I will want to this will have exactly one addressee, norm.
You're tryin
Ken Hornstein writes:
>As a side note ... Norm, when I try to reply to your message, I get
>the following warning from repl:
>
>repl: bad addresses:
>nmh-workers@nongnu.org n...@dad.org -- junk after local@domain (norm)
>nmh-workers@nongnu.org n...@dad.org -- junk after local@domain (norm)
>
>This
Ken Hornstein writes:
>>Is there any way I could change it for a single message, short of
>>modifying mts.conf -- maybe some kind of entry in .mh_profile or
>>something? Note that messages for which I will want to this will have
>>exactly one addressee, norm.
>
>Ah, okay, I understand ... and now
>Is there any way I could change it for a single message, short of
>modifying mts.conf -- maybe some kind of entry in .mh_profile or
>something? Note that messages for which I will want to this will have
>exactly one addressee, norm.
Ah, okay, I understand ... and now that I think about it, yes!
"KH" == Ken Hornstein
>> "correct" From: and a Message-ID, amongst other headers I'm
>> not so concerned with.
KH> Fair enough ... two notes, however:
KH> - You can have send/post add a Message-ID header with the
KH> -msgid flag, and that ends up in the saved message if you
Ken Hornstein writes:
>As a side note ... Norm, when I try to reply to your message, I get
>the following warning from repl:
>
>repl: bad addresses:
>nmh-workers@nongnu.org n...@dad.org -- junk after local@domain (norm)
>nmh-workers@nongnu.org n...@dad.org -- junk after local@domain (norm)
>
>This
>Has the default of the --with-mts= configure option changed at all
>recently. I was suprised to have to specify --with-mts=sendmail when I
>recently rebuilt the Nmh that I use daily.
If I'm reading the logs correctly, that's actually been the default
since Doug Morris took over from Richard Colem
>"correct" From: and a Message-ID, amongst other headers I'm not so
>concerned with.
Fair enough ... two notes, however:
- You can have send/post add a Message-ID header with the -msgid flag,
and that ends up in the saved message if you use Fcc (just checked
that).
- I think you _might_ have
n...@dad.org wrote:
>
> I'm very sorry. I was unclear. As far as I know, the problem probably has
> little
> to do with the upgrade. I recently installed Linux on the computer in question
> (It previously ran Microsoft Windows), so I installed the latest version, 1.4,
> of nmh on it. I have had s
Hi Ken,
> > I've never liked fcc: and always dcc: myself instead.
>
> Just curious ... why? I mean, either way works, and it doesn't really
> bother me that people don't like Fcc, but I just like to understand
> how other people use nmh.
>From a diff of the same email fcc:'d and dcc:'d I see th
>I've never liked fcc: and always dcc: myself instead.
Just curious ... why? I mean, either way works, and it doesn't really
bother me that people don't like Fcc, but I just like to understand how
other people use nmh.
--Ken
___
Nmh-workers mailing li
Ken wrote:
> This happens because you have multiple cc: headers ... and
> according to the relevant RFCs, that isn't actually permitted
I've never seen multiple Cc: headers in an nmh draft. Norm,
did you add any? If not, does your .mh_profile have any -cc
switches for repl (assuming you used th
Hi,
Ken wrote:
> I think to make it do exactly what you want you'll have to modify your
> sendmail/postfix/whatever-mta configuration to deliver "local" email
> locally and then punt all other email to your ISPs SMTP server.
That's what I do. Have Postfix punt everything non-local to the ISP's
"
As a side note ... Norm, when I try to reply to your message, I get
the following warning from repl:
repl: bad addresses:
nmh-workers@nongnu.org n...@dad.org -- junk after local@domain (norm)
nmh-workers@nongnu.org n...@dad.org -- junk after local@domain (norm)
This happens becaus
Ken Hornstein writes:
>> norm: loses; [USER] 550 5.1.1 ... User unknown
>> post: 1 addressee undeliverable send: message not delivered to anyone
>
>So, I'm wondering ... previous version of nmh worked fine, is that
>right?
I'm very sorry. I was unclear. As far as I know, the problem pro
> norm: loses; [USER] 550 5.1.1 ... User unknown
> post: 1 addressee undeliverable send: message not delivered to anyone
So, I'm wondering ... previous version of nmh worked fine, is that
right? What version did you have previously? If you still have that old
version of nmh around, wha
Step 1. Vanilla installation . I built and installed nmh 1.4 accepting all
defaults.
nmh almost worked fine. In particular, mail addressed simply to "norm" got put
in my local mail drop. BUT for a few addressees I got a rejection note such as
the forwarded message below.
Step 2. I changed the "se
17 matches
Mail list logo
