Re: [Nmh-workers] Fcc: with no addressees

2012-02-18 Thread David Levine
Because if there are no addresses, the message can't be sent and there would be nothing to copy. David Norm wrote: > I'm curious: why can't I 'send" a message no addressees but with an > Fcc: ? ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org htt

[Nmh-workers] Fcc: with no addressees

2012-02-18 Thread norm
I'm curious: why can't I 'send" a message no addressees but with an Fcc: ? Norman Shapiro 798 Barron Avenue Palo Alto CA 94306-3109 (650) 565-8215 n...@dad.org ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.

[Nmh-workers] mhpath documentation updated

2012-02-18 Thread David Levine
The mhpath man page said this: Message numbers greater than the highest existing message in a folder as part of a range designation are replaced with the next free message number. And had this example, when the last message in the folder is 6: % mhpath 2001 /r/phyl/Mail/foo/7 However,

Re: [Nmh-workers] I need help configuring nmh 1.4

2012-02-18 Thread norm
Lyndon Nerenberg writes: > >On 2012-02-17, at 11:21 AM, n...@dad.org wrote: > >> Is there any way I could change it for a single message, short of modifying >> mts.conf -- maybe some kind of entry in .mh_profile or something? Note that >> messages for which I will want to this will have exactly on