David Levine levin...@acm.org writes:
Norm wrote:
If foobar is a message sequence then something like forbar+3, for
the third message of foobar, would make my life a bit easier.
Even better, would be to allow forbar+3,4 and foobar
forbar+3-5. Then, recursively, and perhaps a bit fancifully,
The mark man page (version nmh-1.5) has:
'As expected, the command mark -sequence foo -delete all deletes the
sequence foo from the current folder.'
I think that what is meant is
'As expected, the command mark -sequence foo -delete all deletes all
the messages in the current
Norm wrote:
The mark man page (version nmh-1.5) has:
'As expected, the command mark -sequence foo -delete all deletes the
sequence foo from the current folder.'
I think that what is meant is
'As expected, the command mark -sequence foo -delete all deletes all
the
David Levine levin...@acm.org writes:
Norm wrote:
The mark man page (version nmh-1.5) has:
'As expected, the command mark -sequence foo -delete all deletes the
sequence foo from the current folder.'
I think that what is meant is
'As expected, the command mark -sequence foo
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:18:50 -0700, n...@dad.org said:
The mark man page (version nmh-1.5) has:
'As expected, the command mark -sequence foo -delete all deletes the
sequence foo from the current folder.'
I think that what is meant is
'As expected, the command mark -sequence foo
How about this:
As expected, the command mark -sequence foo -delete all
removes all messages from the sequence foo, and
therefore removes that sequence from the current folder.
David
___
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
David Levine levin...@acm.org writes:
How about this:
As expected, the command mark -sequence foo -delete all
removes all messages from the sequence foo, and
therefore removes that sequence from the current folder.
Much better, I think. But I'm no longer a good judge; I now know what it's
n...@dad.org wrote:
David Levine levin...@acm.org writes:
How about this:
As expected, the command mark -sequence foo -delete all
removes all messages from the sequence foo, and
therefore removes that sequence from the current folder.
how about
As expected, the command mark
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:50:59 -0400, Paul Fox said:
n...@dad.org wrote:
David Levine levin...@acm.org writes:
How about this:
As expected, the command mark -sequence foo -delete all
removes all messages from the sequence foo, and
therefore removes that sequence from the current
n...@dad.org wrote:
David Levine levin...@acm.org writes:
Norm wrote:
The mark man page (version nmh-1.5) has:
'As expected, the command mark -sequence foo -delete all deletes the
sequence foo from the current folder.'
I think that what is meant is
'As expected, the command
David Levine wrote:
How about this:
As expected, the command mark -sequence foo -delete all
removes all messages from the sequence foo, and
therefore removes that sequence from the current folder.
David
i love that.
___
Nmh-workers
Valdis wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:50:59 -0400, Paul Fox said:
how about
As expected, the command mark -sequence foo -delete all empties
the sequence foo, and therefore removes that sequence from the
current folder.
from the current folder's list of sequences, perhaps?
12 matches
Mail list logo
