Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh dependence on metamail

2013-05-18 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Sat, 18 May 2013 11:20:00 -0500, Dale Alspach writes: >Are there any replacements for metamail or an updated source? >exmh seems to work fine. in 2008 i modified exmh to try mimencode first (that's from metamail if you still have it), then fall back to recode and if that's unavailable use the

[Nmh-workers] nmh dependence on metamail

2013-05-18 Thread Dale Alspach
Ubuntu 12.04 includes a package for nmh but none for metamail. Someone noted this in a bug report. Debian seems to have abandoned metamail. In Ubuntu 10.xx I was able to make it work from source. The source that I have for metamail 2.7 will not compile on my upgraded system and I am not knowledgeab

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh dependence on metamail

2013-05-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ken Hornstein on Sat, 18 May 2013 14:50:26 -0400: > - exmh does have a dependency on metamail, sort of. It uses mmencode > to decode quoted-printable and base64. It can use another program > (which I forget the name of but comes on some Linux systems) instead. > It also has an in

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh dependence on metamail

2013-05-18 Thread Ken Hornstein
>Ubuntu 12.04 includes a package for nmh but none for metamail. Someone >noted this in a bug report. Debian seems to have abandoned metamail. >In Ubuntu 10.xx I was able to make it work from source. >The source that I have for metamail 2.7 will not compile on my upgraded >system and I am not knowle

Re: [Nmh-workers] Date syntax

2013-05-18 Thread norm
Jerrad Pierce writes: >FTM > >In addition to 822-style dates, pick will also recognize any of the >days of the week ("sunday", "monday", and so on), and the special dates >"today", "yesterday" (24 hours ago), and "tomorrow" (24 hours from >now). All days of the week are judged to refe