On 2013-05-25, at 5:30 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> And remind me ... weren't you the one who advocated everyone reading
> meillo's thesis, where he makes a compelling case for removing _exactly_
> stuff like this? :-)
Yup, but without busting anything people still might be using, without fair
wa
>We currently alias expand '*' to every account in the password database
>with a UID>200. This seems anachronistic to say the least. Tell me why
>I shouldn't eradicate this code forthwith.
I cannot imagine any reasonable use for this code; I vote for removing
it completely. Sure, there may be so
On 2013-05-25, at 4:57 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
> It was never correct or clean or useful. Today it's only interesting as a
> museum piece.
Just checking to see if a museum piece is still using it. There's a lot of
still-running MH-based code that hasn't been touched in decades ...
Most likely
It was never correct or clean or useful. Today it's only interesting as a
museum piece.
Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>We currently alias expand '*' to every account in the password database
>with a UID>200. This seems anachronistic to say the least. Tell me why
>I shouldn't eradicate this code for
We currently alias expand '*' to every account in the password database with a
UID>200. This seems anachronistic to say the least. Tell me why I shouldn't
eradicate this code forthwith.
uip/aliasbr.c (/EVERYONE) and man/mh-alias.man for details.
___
N
On Sat, 25 May 2013 06:17:02 -0700, n...@dad.org said:
> As I read, RFC822, Section 5.1, the zone filed field of Date components, is
> required. Do I misread it? I have encountered one Email, for which it is
> missing. It there a de defacto standard which makes it optional?
Are you able to identi
Norm wrote:
> As I read, RFC822, Section 5.1, the zone filed field of
> Date components, is required. Do I misread it? I have
> encountered one Email, for which it is missing. It there a
> de defacto standard which makes it optional?
I agree that it is required by RFC 822. And also by RFC
2822,
As I read, RFC822, Section 5.1, the zone filed field of Date components, is
required. Do I misread it? I have encountered one Email, for which it is
missing. It there a de defacto standard which makes it optional?
Norman Shapiro
798 Barron Avenue
Palo Alto CA 94306-3109
(650) 56
