>No, I don't always want MIME headers. I'm old-fashioned and don't need
>a kilobyte where 10 bytes will suffice. I like nmh because text-plain is
>good enough for most of what I do.
If you have a plain message, the only thing that gets changed is the following
headers get added:
MIME-Version: 1
Jon Steinhart writes:
>No, I don't always want MIME headers. I'm old-fashioned and don't need
>a kilobyte where 10 bytes will suffice. I like nmh because text-plain is
>good enough for most of what I do.
Hear! Hear!
Norman Shapiro
___
Nmh-worke
david wrote:
> Paul wrote:
>
> > that's an interesting point, and i just realized that it's one reason
> > i've never been comfortable with attach. my editor supports enough
> > filename completion that when inserting the mhbuild directive (via a
> > helper script), i can be sure that the f
Ralph Corderoy writes:
> Hi Jon,
>
> > > No, sorry, when I said "edit" I was referring to a whatnow-entry to
> > > put me back in vi so I can read-only peruse the outcome of "mime".
> > > My intent is always to have "mime" do the work; if something's not
> > > right I go back to pre-"mime" and fi
Hi Jon,
> > No, sorry, when I said "edit" I was referring to a whatnow-entry to
> > put me back in vi so I can read-only peruse the outcome of "mime".
> > My intent is always to have "mime" do the work; if something's not
> > right I go back to pre-"mime" and fix it because mhbuild could
> > alwa
Ralph Corderoy writes:
> Hi Ken,
>
> > The reason this is cropping up now is that we want to get to the point
> > where a MIME headers are always generated (I assume this is
> > non-controversial).
>
> Looks down. Mumbles "No". Scuffs foot.
No, I don't always want MIME headers. I'm old-fashio
Hi Ken,
> The reason this is cropping up now is that we want to get to the point
> where a MIME headers are always generated (I assume this is
> non-controversial).
Looks down. Mumbles "No". Scuffs foot.
> Using the tools we have, this means running mhbuild. This was never
> designed to be ru
Paul wrote:
> that's an interesting point, and i just realized that it's one reason
> i've never been comfortable with attach. my editor supports enough
> filename completion that when inserting the mhbuild directive (via a
> helper script), i can be sure that the filename is spelled correctly
>
david wrote:
> Ken wrote:
>
> > Can the people who want to have "attach" append mhbuild directives
> > explain what their thinking is, specifically why they think their
> > approach is preferrable? I went back and looked at the thread very
> > carefully, and none of the proponents of this a
